![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When ATC says you are "cleared" that is exactly what that means. You
are ok to proceed from that instant. The exceptions are when they add "hold for release". At tower controlled airports, you are actually on hold for release because you need a separate clearance for takeoff, at which point you are considered to be released into the system. On Apr 11, 2:11 am, "Travis Marlatte" wrote: "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message ps.com... I am unclear on why you thought this clearance was unclear. You were cleared to D95 and you were told to climb to 5000. What additional instructions were you expecting to make that clearance valid? Regarding the squawk code, it is not all that unusual to get the code on the first call and get the complete clearance afterwards. I dunno. I guess I am more used to the three-step process of filing the clearance, receiving the clearance, and finally being released into the system. On the ground, that always happens. Someone suggested that I don't air-file very often. That's probably true in the big scheme of things but I have done it a good number of times. I don't ever remember questioning whether I was really cleared or not before so maybe I'm just having a brain fade. I think I was expecting something like, "readback correct. Proceed on course. Climb maintain 5000." Someone suggested that as soon as the words were spoken they would have turned and climbed. That doesn't seem right. That seems like it doesn't give the controller a chance to manage their airspace. In my mind, I'm leaving room for something different. Such as, "readback correct. Fly heading 030 for traffic. Climb maintain 3000. I'll have higher for you in a few miles." OK. I'm done. Every response has been along the lines of "what's the problem!" so I guess it's just me. -- ------------------------------- Travis Lake N3094P PWK |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unclear Clearance | Mitty | Instrument Flight Rules | 53 | December 24th 05 02:36 AM |
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
Taxi Clearance | Ron Rosenfeld | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | September 29th 05 01:57 PM |
Clearance with an Odd Intersection | Marco Leon | Instrument Flight Rules | 92 | March 11th 05 03:16 PM |
GPS clearance puzzle | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | December 9th 04 12:22 AM |