![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark,
would this arrangement work well enough with all predefined flap setting? One would have to establish a base line for example, one would start with say a Cl of 1.35 for max climbing performance in 45 deg. bank and x flap setting. Would the system respond true enough through out the usable Cl range and corresponding flap settings with that established base line? I could see were this arrangement would not correlate well at the other usable Cl number. I really do not know and would like to find out. On Jul 10, 7:31 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote: Bill Daniels wrote: I've wondered if pressure ports on the top and bottom of the fuselage nose where the nose contours are at about 45 degrees to the airstream wouldn't give about the same pressure diferential that could be used to compute AoA. The factory AOA meter in my DG-600 uses cross-connected pairs of fuselage static ports just above the wing root, one set just aft of the leading edge, and another at roughly 50% chord. The meter appears to be a slightly modified electronic vario. Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nav radio settings in FMC | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 5 | January 10th 07 08:39 PM |
Warrior cruise RPM settings | lardsoup | Piloting | 35 | October 9th 05 11:59 PM |
Altimeter settings: QNH versus QFE | stephanevdv | Soaring | 25 | June 7th 05 08:06 AM |
ATC Altimeter Settings | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | April 11th 05 08:07 PM |
L-nav Settings Ventus 2ct-18 | Oliver Peters | Soaring | 4 | July 18th 03 04:14 AM |