![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:56:05 -0800, Terence Wilson
wrote: When flying a VOR approach in which the FAF is defined by the VOR, is it appropriate to start the descent to the MAP, or next stepdown, immediately after overflying the VOR or should I wait until I have positive course guidance for the final approach segment? I ask because it can sometimes take 1-2nm for the CDI to move, which may require a rushed descent to the MAP on some approaches. Good question. Yes you may. Don't have the aim or far in front of me, but I've always waited for first positive indication of the FROM indicator. You do not need pos course guidance to start descent. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin 430 rquestion- does the approach always have to be activated via "activate approach"? | Terence Wilson | Instrument Flight Rules | 46 | February 18th 08 05:46 PM |
When to descend II | Dan Luke[_2_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 76 | November 27th 07 08:12 PM |
When to descend | Dan Luke[_2_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | October 14th 07 09:12 AM |
VOR approach SMO | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 124 | August 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |