![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:22:18 -0800, Sam Spade
wrote: Les Izmore wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:24:39 -0800, Sam Spade wrote: Terence Wilson wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:01:14 -0800, Sam Spade wrote: Terence Wilson wrote: When flying a VOR approach in which the FAF is defined by the VOR, is it appropriate to start the descent to the MAP, or next stepdown, immediately after overflying the VOR or should I wait until I have positive course guidance for the final approach segment? I ask because it can sometimes take 1-2nm for the CDI to move, which may require a rushed descent to the MAP on some approaches. Are you a simulator only pilot? I ask, because that is a question that would be answered during instrument training. Sam, I think you asked me that question before and I answered ![]() I'm a RW instrument student. Forgive me my lousy memory. I figured your CFI-I would have covered this by now. When the two-from indicator indicated "from," you should turn to the appropriate heading and begin descent at that time. You are effectively on-course because you are over the station where the courses are very, very small. Sort of like lines of longitude at the North Pole. Now, the question is, when you are 2 miles from the VOR and the needle still has not moved (because of bad navigation, winds, whatever),and you have descended xhundred feet, what do you do? Are you going back up? Probably not. Starting down without at least some indication that the needle is moving back towards center can very well be the beginning of the pernicious and well-known accident chain. Don't do it. That would represent issues of lack of competency to be 2 miles from the station and not have a needle moving back towards center. In fact the needle should be moving back towards center far sooner than that. Well, that is precisely the reason why it is bad advice to start down with no indication of movement of the needle. If it does indeed start moving far sooner than that, then there is minimal if any penalty for waiting. If it does not start moving sooner than that, there is good reason (issues of incompetency being one) not to have already begun the descent. So I'll say it again for emphasis. Until there is some indication that the needle is moving toward the center, indicating a return to the desired course, don't descend below the FAF altitude. (The 2 miles, incidentally, was what the poster used as a basis for his question). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin 430 rquestion- does the approach always have to be activated via "activate approach"? | Terence Wilson | Instrument Flight Rules | 46 | February 18th 08 05:46 PM |
When to descend II | Dan Luke[_2_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 76 | November 27th 07 08:12 PM |
When to descend | Dan Luke[_2_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | October 14th 07 09:12 AM |
VOR approach SMO | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 124 | August 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |