![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Esres wrote:
Les Izmore wrote: This is being treated like some kind of academic angels-on-the-head- of-a-pin question. It is not. Not to you, maybe. People ask questions here for a variety of reasons: 1) legality, 2) safety, 3) passing checkrides, 4) curiosity, etc. Regarding safety, no doubt you're 100% correct. We have a local VOR approach with a course change at the FAF and a high descent gradient on final. Without descending immediately pass the VOR, the odds of getting in shrink rapidly. Not to mention real issues trying to do a slam-dunk low to the ground. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin 430 rquestion- does the approach always have to be activated via "activate approach"? | Terence Wilson | Instrument Flight Rules | 46 | February 18th 08 05:46 PM |
When to descend II | Dan Luke[_2_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 76 | November 27th 07 08:12 PM |
When to descend | Dan Luke[_2_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | October 14th 07 09:12 AM |
VOR approach SMO | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 124 | August 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |