![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 18, 7:55*am, Stefan wrote:
WingFlaps schrieb: So an altimeter set to local QNH will always read field elevation *by definition*. Yes it may say that but it's being loose because it forgt to include the "barometric pressure reduced to MSL by application of the ISA". Alltimeters are calibrated for the standard atmosphere. -right? Right. Think about it, if an ARFOR gives QNH how could it be correct for all terrain if local temperatures differed? *I covered this in my PPL tech course -was this not covered in your manuals? Think about it, nobody said it would be correct for all altitudes, but just for one altitude: the airfield elevation. Perhap we are at crossed purposes but an ARFOR does not refer to an airfield -that's a METAR and not all fields issue them. So in this case how can QNH give field elevation unless it's an ISA day? Cheers Cheers Cheers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for TSO Altimeter | Rob Turk | Home Built | 0 | June 9th 07 03:52 PM |
Altimeter off | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | March 26th 07 12:11 PM |
Altimeter discrepancy | Gene Whitt | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 1st 05 07:11 PM |
ATC Altimeter Settings | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | April 11th 05 08:07 PM |
Altimeter Disassembly | Dick | Home Built | 3 | April 2nd 05 01:27 PM |