![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 9:00*am, jcarlyle wrote:
Recent threads highlighted tail stalls in powered aircraft experiencing icing. The thing that concerned me was the recovery being exactly opposite to the wing stall that we all practice and demonstrate, and thus have ingrained as almost automatic. Why would the recovery be different? The tail is an inverted wing producing a down force. You stall it by pulling back on the stick increasing its AOA until it stalls. Releasing the back pressure initiates a recovery - same as a wing stall. It also sounded like the thing that distinguished a tail stall from a wing stall was buffet in the controls rather than in the airframe. This distinction is pretty subtle to me, and in the heat of the moment I wonder if I would apply the proper recovery. It doesn't really matter. With many trainers, the buffet students are taught to recognize as wing stall is, in fact, tail stall with a little bit of turbulence from wing root flow separation thrown in. Allowing the tail to stall limits up elevator authority so the wing can never get into a full stall. Cessna 152's and SGS 2-33's are examples. There's a simple test for this. With the stick full back and the glider exhibiting pre-stall buffet, apply aileron and if the glider responds normally in roll, the wing wasn't stalled. If the wing was stalled, the glider would probably try to spin with the application of aileron. Does anyone know, for a modern 40:1 glider, how violent a tail stall pitch up would be? If the tail stalls, and the CG is within limits, the glider will pitch nose down, not nose up, and this will help effect the recovery. If anything, modern gliders are even more benign than older designs. Also, if a glider has a totatally benign wing stall, eg, non-violent wing stall break, would this imply that a tail stall would also be non-violent? Tail stall just runs out of up elevator authority. With one exception, tail stall is benign. This is the exception. When the nose up moment is being produced by something other than the elevator, the stick will be forward as the pilot tries to limit the pitch up. In this case, the tail is producing an up force and if the it stalls, the nose will rise further risking a wing stall. Two things can produce this situation. One is an aft CG and the other is a poorly located CG hook used on a winch launch. Slab type all moving 'stabilators' are more susceptible to this than fixed stab/ hinged elevator type tails. The fix is to be very aware of your CG and to winch these gliders carefully. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Secondary Stall | w3n-a | Aviation Marketplace | 3 | December 10th 08 12:36 PM |
Stall Characteristics | w3n-a | Home Built | 0 | December 4th 08 02:45 PM |
Glider Stall Spin Video on YouTube | ContestID67 | Soaring | 13 | July 5th 07 08:56 AM |
Stall Recovery | Danny Deger | Piloting | 12 | January 30th 07 01:01 AM |
FS: Blanik L-13 Tail Skid & Tail Wheel Assembly | Tim Hanke | Soaring | 0 | February 8th 05 01:34 PM |