![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 15, 8:57*am, "Dan Marotta" wrote:
Really, how accurately can you measure 2.9 inches, mark it, and cut it? I think that just on the far side of 2-7/8" would do just fine. ...it looks like 100:2.9 is an angle of 1.6618 degrees. *Will a digital level get that accuracy? Is that accuracy really necessary? Most digital levels will offer repeatable measurements to 0.1 degrees, and I think that that is close enough. In this case I'd feel fine about a reading of 1.7 degrees. For my fuselage, the exact tailboom slope is 1.213 degrees, but 1.2 or even 1-1/4 degrees would be fine. What's the good of a parallel surface if it's not accessible? *Why not make, say, the arm rest parallel to the longitudinal axis? *Then you could simply place a carpenter's level on the arm rest and, voila! Thanks, the armrest trick is a good idea, I might adopt that; it would be useful for people who have digital levels that beep when they're actually level. Thanks again, Bob K. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
vibration measurement system | Stu Fields | Rotorcraft | 9 | May 27th 11 04:07 AM |
fuel flow measurement | khanindra jyoti deka | Home Built | 0 | January 5th 05 04:34 AM |
TAS measurement | Bravo Delta | Piloting | 4 | June 30th 04 11:55 PM |
Time Measurement for Inspections | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 15 | April 7th 04 05:26 AM |
units of measurement on altimeters | Pat Norton | Piloting | 30 | March 21st 04 06:00 AM |