![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 15 October 2020 at 00:27:59 UTC+3, Ramy wrote:
I couldn’t agree less with the notion that you need a top racer to go anywhere. It may be the case in contest racing where every small performance advantage is significant, but the performance difference is insignificant for the rest of cross country flights. You May fly few miles less or few mph slower. I agree it wouldn’t matter for those who fly locally, but a significant number of pilots such as myself don’t fly contests or records but fly aggressive cross country as you can see on OLC. The AS34 should be marketed for this significant segment of soaring pilots, not for clubs and local fliers. Ramy I own and fly LS8-st. I fly "agressively" OLC, national records, nationals and occasionally worlds. Did my FAI 1000k badge in it. There is nothing wrong with 18m/std. class racers designed in mid to late 90's, they are wonderful ships. You can do a lot things with them. My point was, that if performance is important, you should consider more modern flapped designs than differences between these designs. No matter what the handicaps are, if you fly LS8 side by side with V3 you start to cry in 3 minutes. And then the marketing. Factories start building them and pilots buy them. Yes they have websites, they try to put latest designs in to a hands of good pilots (who have ordered the first serial numbers 10 years earlier anyway) and some even offer test flights. I have not witnessed anything that I would even remotely call "marketing to a segment". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
krasw wrote on 10/14/2020 11:08 PM:
On Thursday, 15 October 2020 at 00:27:59 UTC+3, Ramy wrote: I couldn’t agree less with the notion that you need a top racer to go anywhere. It may be the case in contest racing where every small performance advantage is significant, but the performance difference is insignificant for the rest of cross country flights. You May fly few miles less or few mph slower. I agree it wouldn’t matter for those who fly locally, but a significant number of pilots such as myself don’t fly contests or records but fly aggressive cross country as you can see on OLC. The AS34 should be marketed for this significant segment of soaring pilots, not for clubs and local fliers. Ramy I own and fly LS8-st. I fly "agressively" OLC, national records, nationals and occasionally worlds. Did my FAI 1000k badge in it. There is nothing wrong with 18m/std. class racers designed in mid to late 90's, they are wonderful ships. You can do a lot things with them. My point was, that if performance is important, you should consider more modern flapped designs than differences between these designs. No matter what the handicaps are, if you fly LS8 side by side with V3 you start to cry in 3 minutes. And then the marketing. Factories start building them and pilots buy them. Yes they have websites, they try to put latest designs in to a hands of good pilots (who have ordered the first serial numbers 10 years earlier anyway) and some even offer test flights. I have not witnessed anything that I would even remotely call "marketing to a segment". Perhaps it is remarks like these on the AS website that Ramy is thinking about: "Our new entry in the area of independent electric power This affordable 18/15m sailplane with all its normal quality and safety features, combined with a powerful electrical propulsion system, opens new possibilities for casual pilots and clubs." -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric, exactly! This comment on their web site seriously dumped my enthusiasm!
If I decide to buy the 34 they will need to remove this comment first ![]() Ramy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 6:25:32 PM UTC-7, Ramy wrote:
Eric, exactly! This comment on their web site seriously dumped my enthusiasm! If I decide to buy the 34 they will need to remove this comment first ![]() Ramy Based on a 28 with possible 18m wing options. How does that sound? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASW 20C Motorglider | Nick Kennedy[_3_] | Soaring | 3 | February 7th 19 11:17 AM |
FS: DG-400 Motorglider | 2G | Soaring | 0 | September 20th 13 02:32 PM |
IFR in motorglider? | cp | Soaring | 28 | March 9th 08 12:02 AM |
Motorglider Tug | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 21 | November 13th 04 04:06 AM |
motorglider | KsiTau | Soaring | 0 | September 4th 04 09:10 AM |