c-152 rudder???

IMHO, the C-150 is the best 2-seat plane for the money there is.

I'd take a Citabria any day over the 150/152. It's just a lot more fun flying.


--
Dr. Nuketopia
Sorry, no e-Mail.
Spam forgeries have resulted in thousands of faked bounces to my address.

funny you should mention the citabria. i've been drooling over those
too and i even know where there's an ignored one with half flat tires
and evidence that she was a banner-dragger up untill maybe a year ago.

end of the day, i like having that seat beside me. honestly, i didn't
know there was an aerobatic 150/2 out there so now i have to read up
on that. i really like the idea of having something that is rated for
high stress if i'm just going to be putting around. what's the price
premium for aerobatic rating? i'm already interested in taildraggers
so...


dan

"houstondan" wrote in message
oups.com...
funny you should mention the citabria. i've been drooling over those
too and i even know where there's an ignored one with half flat tires
and evidence that she was a banner-dragger up untill maybe a year ago.

end of the day, i like having that seat beside me. honestly, i didn't
know there was an aerobatic 150/2 out there so now i have to read up
on that. i really like the idea of having something that is rated for
high stress if i'm just going to be putting around. what's the price
premium for aerobatic rating? i'm already interested in taildraggers
so...


dan

If you are interested in taildraggers check the Cessna 120/140s. They will
do everything a 150/2 will do only faster and burn less fuel.

The issue on the 150/152 is the vertical stabilizer attachment and not
the rudder. See http://www.cessna150-152.com/acs-vtab.htm



Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

Well, there we are. The FAA isn't concerned about the rudder stops;
only Cessna and the Canadian Government are. The fin attach is what the
FAA wants looked at, and it seems to be age-related as the rate of SDR
reports comes up. They also mention horizontal stab spar cracking,
which has been an issue in 172s for years and is (in the 172, at least)
often caused by folks pushing down on the stab to turn the airplane on
the ground.
I would anticipate many more issues arising as the fleet ages.
Our older 172s are beginning to show the odd crack here and there, and
Cessna sends out Service Bulletins that we take seriously and we often
find problems where they tell us to look. There are 172s here in Canada
with almost 20,000 hours on them, still flying, but they require
watching. I don't think Cessna ever intended them to last so long. I
wish new ones cost less.

Dan