![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sydney Hoeltzli writes:
*I have observed a number of pilots who are instrument rated and current, but who fail to meet the IR PTS or who no longer know basic things, like what a low-altitude airway is and what its MEA means *I have heard pilots whose radio work and knowledge of IFR procedures seemd quite lacking. I know for a fact some of them are IR *I know some pilots who are not IR whose knowledge of regs and procedures are extensive, and who are quite able to fly to tight tolerances on instruments Canada requires instrument-rated pilots to retake the complete IFR flight test (including the ground portion) every two years. I understand that the IFR checkride in the U.S. is a once-in-a-lifetime thing, like the PPL checkride. Would you prefer to use the Canadian system, or would that seem like unwelcome government interference to U.S. pilots? All the best, David -- David Megginson, , http://www.megginson.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Megginson" wrote in message
... Canada requires instrument-rated pilots to retake the complete IFR flight test (including the ground portion) every two years. I understand that the IFR checkride in the U.S. is a once-in-a-lifetime thing, like the PPL checkride. Would you prefer to use the Canadian system, or would that seem like unwelcome government interference to U.S. pilots? I don't know how I feel about this one yet... I just completed my training last week. In the U.S., you can maintain your currency as long as you fly 6 approaches and do some holding and tracking every 6 months. I'm wondering if anybody who has let their currency lapse completely (beyond 12 months), and has taken a checkride with a CFII or examiner, feels that that was adequate to getting you current again? I imagine a lot of practice would be required before someone felt safe enough to carry passengers or even fly solo in the system once those skills have been idle for so long. -- Guy Elden Jr. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Guy Elden Jr." wrote in message
... [...] I'm wondering if anybody who has let their currency lapse completely (beyond 12 months), and has taken a checkride with a CFII or examiner, feels that that was adequate to getting you current again? I have, several times. I imagine a lot of practice would be required before someone felt safe enough to carry passengers or even fly solo in the system once those skills have been idle for so long. You are correct. If I haven't flown IFR for a year (give or take), it takes at least three hours of instrument training for me to feel like I'm back up to snuff, sometimes more. Two or three lessons has been typical when I've been away from the instrument stuff that long. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
ATC says wrong position | Greg Esres | Instrument Flight Rules | 28 | April 30th 04 05:37 PM |
Were the Tuskeegee Airmen Wrong? | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 63 | February 14th 04 07:38 PM |
A Brilliant Idea | nafod40 | Home Built | 4 | September 9th 03 10:33 PM |
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap | tim liverance | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 03 12:18 AM |