A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What's wrong with this idea?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 1st 03, 12:58 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sydney Hoeltzli writes:

*I have observed a number of pilots who are instrument rated
and current, but who fail to meet the IR PTS or who no longer
know basic things, like what a low-altitude airway is and what
its MEA means
*I have heard pilots whose radio work and knowledge of IFR
procedures seemd quite lacking. I know for a fact some of
them are IR
*I know some pilots who are not IR whose knowledge of regs and
procedures are extensive, and who are quite able to fly to
tight tolerances on instruments


Canada requires instrument-rated pilots to retake the complete IFR
flight test (including the ground portion) every two years. I
understand that the IFR checkride in the U.S. is a once-in-a-lifetime
thing, like the PPL checkride. Would you prefer to use the Canadian
system, or would that seem like unwelcome government interference to
U.S. pilots?


All the best,


David

--
David Megginson, , http://www.megginson.com/
  #2  
Old August 3rd 03, 04:01 PM
Guy Elden Jr.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"David Megginson" wrote in message
...
Canada requires instrument-rated pilots to retake the complete IFR
flight test (including the ground portion) every two years. I
understand that the IFR checkride in the U.S. is a once-in-a-lifetime
thing, like the PPL checkride. Would you prefer to use the Canadian
system, or would that seem like unwelcome government interference to
U.S. pilots?


I don't know how I feel about this one yet... I just completed my training
last week. In the U.S., you can maintain your currency as long as you fly 6
approaches and do some holding and tracking every 6 months. I'm wondering if
anybody who has let their currency lapse completely (beyond 12 months), and
has taken a checkride with a CFII or examiner, feels that that was adequate
to getting you current again? I imagine a lot of practice would be required
before someone felt safe enough to carry passengers or even fly solo in the
system once those skills have been idle for so long.

--
Guy Elden Jr.



  #3  
Old August 3rd 03, 08:52 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Guy Elden Jr." wrote in message
...
[...] I'm wondering if
anybody who has let their currency lapse completely (beyond 12 months),

and
has taken a checkride with a CFII or examiner, feels that that was

adequate
to getting you current again?


I have, several times.

I imagine a lot of practice would be required
before someone felt safe enough to carry passengers or even fly solo in

the
system once those skills have been idle for so long.


You are correct. If I haven't flown IFR for a year (give or take), it takes
at least three hours of instrument training for me to feel like I'm back up
to snuff, sometimes more. Two or three lessons has been typical when I've
been away from the instrument stuff that long.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
ATC says wrong position Greg Esres Instrument Flight Rules 28 April 30th 04 05:37 PM
Were the Tuskeegee Airmen Wrong? Stephen Harding Military Aviation 63 February 14th 04 07:38 PM
A Brilliant Idea nafod40 Home Built 4 September 9th 03 10:33 PM
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap tim liverance Military Aviation 0 August 18th 03 12:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.