![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:02:00 GMT, "Harold" wrote
in Message-Id: : If a small single engine plane can out-climb its engine-out glide ratio from take off through the top of climb point, wouldn't it follow that it can always theoretically make it back to the departure airport in the event of engine failure ? Assuming straight out departure, no wind, and the altitude loss in the 180 turnback is offset by the runway portion you didn't use. If my best glide is 85 KTAS and it loses 700 fpm at that speed, shouldn't I be guaranteed I can make it back if I climb at 84 KTAS and 701 fpm ? The mathematics of turning back to the airport have been thoroughly discussed in the newsgroup a while back. I suggest you do a www.deja.com search for articles authored by John Lowry on the subject. Here's an example: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain From: John T. Lowry ) Subject: Min Turnaround Alt. on Single Engine Aircraft-Engine Failure Question Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Date: 1999/02/26 Dear Mike, Henrik, and All: For the single engine-out return-to-airport maneuver, all the various parameters (aircraft weight and flaps settings, runway length and elevation, wind speed and direction) matter. But a crucial performance number is, instead of just best glide ratio (which is important once the turn is made) or minimum sink rate, the maximum turn rate PER altitude lost, dTheta/dh. As close to (banked) stall as possible. That rate is: Max(dTheta/dh) = -g*Rho*S*CLmax*sin(theta)*sqrt(cos^2(theta)+k^2)/(2*W*k) where g is 32.2 ft/sec^2, Rho is density, S wing area, W weight, and k = CD0/CLmax + CLmax/(Pi*e*A) where CD0 is the parasite drag coefficient, e the airplane efficiency factor, and A the wing aspect ratio. The optimum bank angle is just a little (except for flamed-out jets) OVER 45 degrees and is given by cos(phi_bta) = sqrt(2)*sqrt(1-k^2)/2 You'll find a full discussion in Chapter 9, Glide Performance, of my forthcoming Performance of Light Aircraft published by AIAA. John. John T. Lowry, PhD Flight Physics; Box 20919; Billings MT 59104 Voice: 406-248-2606 -------------------------------------------------------- Here's the formula for best glide http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain From: "John T. Lowry" Subject: Formula for Vbg Date: 1999/02/07 Message-ID: #1/1 References: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Organization: Montana Communications Network Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Dear Phil, and All: There is a fixed relationship between speed for best glide Vbg and speed for minimum descent rate Vmd -- Vbg = 1.3161*Vmd -- but (since you probably don't have Vmd) that won't help you much. Vbg depends on the drag characteristics of the airplane, depending on 1) W/sigma (W gross weight), 2) reference wing area S, 3)wing aspect ratio A, 4)parasite drag coefficient CD0, and 5) airplane efficiency factor e, according to Vbg = sqrt(2*W/sigma*S)*(Pi*e*A*CD0)^-1/4 If you're willing to cut the engines and feather the props, to find Vbg experimentally, here's a rough outline of the procedure. Go to some nice high altitude and pick a vertical interval of pressure altitudes, say for purposes of illustration from 14000 ft down to 13000 ft. Time repeated glides down through that interval and record the product KCAS*delta_t, where delta_t is the time needed for the glide. When you've found, by trial and error, the speed V which maximizes that product, that speed is Vbg. John ---------------------------------------------------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Dighera wrote: The mathematics of turning back to the airport have been thoroughly discussed in the newsgroup a while back. I suggest you do a www.deja.com search for articles authored by John Lowry on the subject. Yeah he's a genius. That's why he keeps wrecking aircraft. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Historic Helsinki-Malmi Airport in trouble - please read | Seppo Sipilä | General Aviation | 0 | December 24th 04 09:04 AM |
STAR to nearby airport | Viperdoc | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | May 13th 04 10:48 PM |
The battle for Arlington Airport begins? | Paul Adriance | Home Built | 45 | March 30th 04 11:41 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
Student Pilot Stories Wanted | Greg Burkhart | Piloting | 6 | September 18th 03 08:57 PM |