![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Harold" wrote:
If a small single engine plane can out-climb its engine-out glide ratio from take off through the top of climb point, wouldn't it follow that it can always theoretically make it back to the departure airport in the event of engine failure ? Assuming straight out departure, no wind, and the altitude loss in the 180 turnback is offset by the runway portion you didn't use. I'm not clear what you mean by that. If my best glide is 85 KTAS and it loses 700 fpm at that speed, shouldn't I be guaranteed I can make it back if I climb at 84 KTAS and 701 fpm ? If by your statement above, you mean that the runway is long enough that if you can't turn back, you can land straight ahead, then of course your statement is trivially true. If not, how can you turn back from 10'? -- Alex Make the obvious change in the return address to reply by email. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If by your statement above, you mean that the runway is long enough that if you can't turn back, you can land straight ahead, then of course your statement is trivially true. If not, how can you turn back from 10'? Do it the way the Space Shuttle does it (theoretically). If they have an abort between liftoff and 4 min 20 sec (I think), they are supposed to execute an RTLS abort (Return to Launch Site). Problem is that no matter what the situation is, they can't do squat until the SRB's are off the stack. Once those puppies are lit, your in for a 2 minute ride whether you want one or not. After the SRB's seperate, the shuttle is supposed to fly around with just the External Tank attached for long enough to burn up fuel and then they cut the engines (if there are any burning) and drop the tank, then glide safely home (again...theoretically). After the 4:20, I guess they file a missed approach and are diverted.....to SPAIN!!!! I truly hope that it is never required, but I've always wondered if this thing would actually work. We all know that the Shuttle has a glide ratio somewhere between my Ford Ranger and a brick 0, so it would be interesting to see how this thing would actually play out. I don't think this procedure is ever going to make it into our C150 POH's. But who knows. 100 years ago, we weren't supposed to be able to fly either. Hrmmm. "Introducing the all new 2067 Model Cessna 150, complete with your choice of Wheel Pants or JATO packs....." Jeff wow...sorry, way off topic........More on RTLS if you ca http://makeashorterlink.com/?G2B044B46 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Historic Helsinki-Malmi Airport in trouble - please read | Seppo Sipilä | General Aviation | 0 | December 24th 04 09:04 AM |
STAR to nearby airport | Viperdoc | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | May 13th 04 10:48 PM |
The battle for Arlington Airport begins? | Paul Adriance | Home Built | 45 | March 30th 04 11:41 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
Student Pilot Stories Wanted | Greg Burkhart | Piloting | 6 | September 18th 03 08:57 PM |