A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OK, why do they cover the prop?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 2nd 04, 07:24 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dale" wrote in message
...
It kept the prop from dissipating the heat applied to the engine by my
pre-heater.


Interesting. I didn't realize so much heat could be transferred through the
crankshaft. I guess it makes sense though...the prop does have a lot of
surface area, so heat flow is easy to have.

On the bright side, with the engine pre-heater pumping heat through the
prop, you didn't have to worry about frost.

Pete


  #2  
Old February 2nd 04, 02:20 PM
Dan Thomas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ...
"Dale" wrote in message
...
It kept the prop from dissipating the heat applied to the engine by my
pre-heater.


Interesting. I didn't realize so much heat could be transferred through the
crankshaft. I guess it makes sense though...the prop does have a lot of
surface area, so heat flow is easy to have.


There's an AD against Lycomings of 160 HP and over using
fixed-pitch props that demands an inspection of the internal bore of
the front end of the crank. This end stays pretty cool when the engine
is running, even in warm weather, and the low temp causes condensation
to form in that bore, which is open to the crankcase, and the water
and oil form acidic sludge that eats pits in the bore and weakens the
crank. I think there has been only one failure so far, though a lot of
cranks have been found with the pitting. Constant-speed props use that
bore (plugged off at the rear) to feed oil to the prop, so it's not a
problem. And I suppose a composite or wooden prop would be much
better, not wicking away so much heat.

Dan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? Gus Rasch Aerobatics 1 February 14th 08 10:18 PM
Ivo Prop on O-320 Dave S Home Built 14 October 15th 04 03:04 AM
This week's AW&ST: apparently THAAD will have some ABM (as in anti- *ICBM*) capability. Scott Ferrin Military Aviation 29 August 31st 04 04:20 AM
IVO props... comments.. Dave S Home Built 16 December 6th 03 11:43 PM
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop Larry Smith Home Built 21 September 26th 03 07:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.