Another Cirrus BRS deployment:

"Richard Kaplan" wrote:
What volume of chute deployments will turn the Cirrus into
the safest GA airplane but ironically economically
non-viable to insure?

That depends on how many pilots get trigger happy about pulling the
'chute in otherwise recoverable situations. If the sum of 'chute and
non-'chute accidents produces a total loss rate higher than for similar
aircraft, that would certainly cause high insurance rates.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
(remove pants to reply by email)

That depends on how many pilots get trigger happy about pulling the
'chute in otherwise recoverable situations.

This will certainly happen. (And in fact would probably be the right
decision: why risk a dead-stick landing in a field that may be full of
rocks or gopher holes or worse, when you can float down instead?)

The criminal justice system has found that "electronic handcuffs",
which confine an individual to house arrest, and which were supposed
to cut down on the prison population, did no such thing. Instead,
judges began sentencing folks to house arrest instead of putting them
on probation.

That's the problem with softer alternatives: they're apt to increase
the wrong side of the equation. In this case, increasing cracked-up
planes rather than decreasing fatal crashes.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org