![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Katz" wrote in message
... As far as we can tell, this has not been the case thusfar. With 1000+ planes in the air and several hundred thousand hours of time on the fleet, there's no sign of this theoretical demographic. I suppose Well, we do know that SOMETHING seems amiss in the accident statistics of the Cirrus. There was a recent article in Aviation Safety which made this clear by comparing accident rates of various airplanes. The Kentucky pilot that attempted to pull the chute (which didn't deploy, resulting in an AD that appears to have had the desired effect) got into unusual attitudes in IMC after an apparent gyro failure with the autopilot engaged. Normally the NTSB reports in such Do you not think unusual attitude recovery ought to be within the capability of an instrument pilot? If we recommend that Cirrus pilots pull the chute whenever a gyro fails in IMC, there will be an awful lot more parachute pulls as their vacuum systems start aging. Perhaps a backup electric AI would be helpful on the original steam-gauge Cirrus models. The details of the Florida case are yet to be revealed, though another high-time Cirrus pilot who talked to the high-time Cirrus pilot that I agree it will be very interesting to see the details. Bottom line is that you don't get to back up in life and try another choice and compare how things come out. You make your choice and stuff happens. Making a choice that results in your walking away uninjured is pretty hard to argue with when the alternative must remain unknown. I agree here. In fact, purely from the perspective of minimizing injuries the chute should probably be pulled if the thought comes to the pilots mind and he starts to debate himself. I agree that approach would make the Cirrus quite safe -- the economics of insuring such an airplane are the question though, and I guess we just have to wait to see how the statistics work out. So far insuring a Cirrus seems to be a good bit more expensive than one might have initially thought for an airplane designed with safety first. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
North Korea Denounces US Stealth Bomber Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 2nd 04 09:20 PM |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | Dennis | Owning | 170 | May 19th 04 04:44 PM |
Cirrus BRS deployment | Dan Luke | Piloting | 37 | April 14th 04 02:28 PM |
C-130 Unit Completes Two Year Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 10:04 PM |
Airmen gear up for another 120-day deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 24th 03 12:04 AM |