![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard,
Well, perhaps they are paying off with no injuries, but keep in mind that hull insurance is much more expensive than liability insurance and keep in mind that chute deployments seem to virtually assure totalled Cirrus airframes. Uhm, you think it would help insurance rates if these people were dead and the planes totalled? Sorry, can't follow your logic. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Uhm, you think it would help insurance rates if these people were dead and the planes totalled? Sorry, can't follow your logic. I do not think anyone has any clear answer on what the long-term track record of the Cirrus will be from either an economic or a safety perspective -- this is all open for discussion and there will no doubt be many viewpoints around for quite some time. If the parachute is used in situations which would have caused serious or fatal injury without the parachute, then of course it will turn out to be a terrific device long-term. On the other hand, if it turns out that the parachute is used often in situations which may well have been recoverable with no airplane damage and no injury, then the increased cost to insure the Cirrus could become impractical. The question really comes down to how often will the BRS be engaged in situations which were doomsday scenarios vs. how often will it be engaged in situations which are typically recoverable in a conventional airplane. No one know the answer to this yet -- not you, not me, not anyone. It will be worthwhile to observe and see how the statistics bear out. Unfortunately, the initial Cirrus statistics show a much higher accident and fatality rate for the Cirrus vs. competing airplanes -- no one knows for sure yet if this is a function of the airplane, the pilots, the mission profiles the airplane is used for, or whatever other reason. Again, no one knows for sure... but it is very worthwhile to keep an eye on this and see how the long-term statistics turn out. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
North Korea Denounces US Stealth Bomber Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 2nd 04 09:20 PM |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | Dennis | Owning | 170 | May 19th 04 04:44 PM |
Cirrus BRS deployment | Dan Luke | Piloting | 37 | April 14th 04 02:28 PM |
C-130 Unit Completes Two Year Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 10:04 PM |
Airmen gear up for another 120-day deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 24th 03 12:04 AM |