![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm betting an IFR ticket would be way more than an ego booster. I dont
think about it as an ego booster or go around bragging about it, but more along the lines of like minimum equipment. Wouldnt your insurance come down a little with that rating? That's pretty useful. The currency required in itself every 6 months, whether with a safety pilot or a CFII, is pretty useful. The IFR chart service and updates are more than a strictly VFR pilot deals with, is useful. The fact ATC, while youre IFR, just cant get rid of you if they feel busy, is useful. The service beyond flight following when it comes to updated airspace activity, weather, and traffic, is pretty useful. Yes, they'd do that for you VFR too, if they can see you and if they have time. The continuity of having your flight plan pass from facility to facility instead of being terminated and telling your life story every other freq, is useful. Scud running just isnt worth it. Not with all the money tied up into an owned aircraft, and not with your family on board. It wouldnt instill confidence in me as a passenger if my pilot didnt do all he/she could do in the way of training and preparation, whether it be a rating, an onboard weather system, and a well maintained airplane. That all being said, I mostly fly day VFR and only file IFR when I need to. But at least it's there if/when I need it. And theres been times where I wouldnt have gone VFR, a low thin layer that an IFR clearance enabled me to pop through, or a detereorating condition at an airport that an IFR approach was fine, but a VFR or SVFR approach would be dicey. As far as embedded thunderstorms, someday soon no one will have any excuse for not having some form of onboard weather capability. More and more small aircraft like yours and mine Jay are telling me "yeah, I see it on radar, too". After some shoptalk on freq it's usually some nexrad download system, or maybe just a stormscope. Certain types I expect to have onboard radar, or are not surprised they have it. Other smaller single engine types that normally dont have a radome on their wing, that are way ahead of their airplane weatherwise, now that's nice to see. Lastly, IFR usually doesnt take you that far out of your way. Compare with a flight planner the difference in miles/time/gallons. And many times those airways take you away from high terrain (I'm talking out west here), put you over/near airports enroute, and in case of GPS failure, keep you in range of VORs. It's just a no brainer for the type of flying it sounds like you do. You're paying for it in avgas taxes whether you use the system or not, use it. Later, Chris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's just a no brainer for the type of flying it sounds like you do.
You're paying for it in avgas taxes whether you use the system or not, use it. Mary and I use "the System" to the fullest extent allowed for VFR flight. We fly over 200 hours per year, all VFR, much of it long cross-country flights, 95% of it with flight-following. When you fly high enough (say, 4500 feet around here), you are guaranteed continuous radar coverage and traffic advisories in pretty much any direction. One controlled airspace seamlessly meshes with another, and the controllers smoothly hand us off for all of our flights -- just the same as on an IFR flight plan. The only time this doesn't work is when we fly beneath their radar coverage. (Or when we simply want to enjoy a short flight without the bother and interruption of ATC.) While I would like to have the rating in my pocket for those rare times when we can't go VFR, it would take months for me to get back up to speed for the test. (Which, two years ago, before we bought the inn, I was signed off to take.) With my time at such a premium, and so little added utility realized for the effort expended, there is little incentive for me to get my instrument ticket at this time. But it's in the "5-year plan"! (Along with adding our own restaurant, remodeling another 17 suites, putting a dome on our pool, etc.-- all of which I plan to do in my "spare time"...) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"center" or "approach" - why important | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | February 9th 05 03:08 PM |
Bush's Attempt to Usurp the Constitution | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 20 | July 2nd 04 04:09 PM |
Historical Center Historian Writes Book On Vietnam Air War | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | May 7th 04 11:26 PM |
Getting students to line up with the center line | BoDEAN | Piloting | 27 | April 21st 04 11:23 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |