![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was told by Kimberly Clark that common paper towels are NOT good for cleaning
polycarbonate or acrylic glass. This would also apply to using tissues on eye glasses. Old style diapers are good for canopy cleaning. GA N39KK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I bought some expensive paper based polishing towels from a plastics
company. They were touted as the 'perfect' acrylic cleaning rag. Unfortunately, they scratched a test piece of plexy just like any paper towel. The common advice to use only soft cloth rags seems to be well founded. I have polished out scratched canopies and to do it right is a LOT of work. Best to never get them scratched in the first place. There are some good scratch removing polishing compounds available but I always wind up with McGuire's #10 as the final wax. #10 takes a lot of work to do it right but the wax is exactly the same refractive index as Plexiglas so the remaining scratches disappear. There is a story going around that #10 leaves the canopy statically charged which attracts dust. I've never seen this if the polish job is done according to the label instructions. Bill Daniels "Nolaminar" wrote in message ... I was told by Kimberly Clark that common paper towels are NOT good for cleaning polycarbonate or acrylic glass. This would also apply to using tissues on eye glasses. Old style diapers are good for canopy cleaning. GA N39KK |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
I bought some expensive paper based polishing towels from a plastics company. They were touted as the 'perfect' acrylic cleaning rag. Unfortunately, they scratched a test piece of plexy just like any paper towel. The common advice to use only soft cloth rags seems to be well founded. I have polished out scratched canopies and to do it right is a LOT of work. Best to never get them scratched in the first place. There are some good scratch removing polishing compounds available but I always wind up with McGuire's #10 as the final wax. #10 takes a lot of work to do it right but the wax is exactly the same refractive index as Plexiglas so the remaining scratches disappear. There is a story going around that #10 leaves the canopy statically charged which attracts dust. I've never seen this if the polish job is done according to the label instructions. Bill Daniels Thanks for the wax recomendation, Bill. Would you go into more detail on the scratch _removal_ stuff. I have a 1968 Hughes OH6A that I'm restoring for display (non-flying) at the new Army Aviation museum. When I got her, the right side of the bubble was heavily coated with a hard mineral deposit. I tried a lot of different things but finally took it off mechanically with wet 1500/2000 grit paper. That worked ok, but left the obvious hazy results, which I am now trying to clear up. The last issue on this project is that I have no financial support of any kind for this project. So what ever will work is what I'll do, but cheaper is better! Thanks, Richard Lamb |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Lamb" wrote in message ... Bill Daniels wrote: I bought some expensive paper based polishing towels from a plastics company. They were touted as the 'perfect' acrylic cleaning rag. Unfortunately, they scratched a test piece of plexy just like any paper towel. The common advice to use only soft cloth rags seems to be well founded. I have polished out scratched canopies and to do it right is a LOT of work. Best to never get them scratched in the first place. There are some good scratch removing polishing compounds available but I always wind up with McGuire's #10 as the final wax. #10 takes a lot of work to do it right but the wax is exactly the same refractive index as Plexiglas so the remaining scratches disappear. There is a story going around that #10 leaves the canopy statically charged which attracts dust. I've never seen this if the polish job is done according to the label instructions. Bill Daniels Thanks for the wax recomendation, Bill. Would you go into more detail on the scratch _removal_ stuff. I have a 1968 Hughes OH6A that I'm restoring for display (non-flying) at the new Army Aviation museum. When I got her, the right side of the bubble was heavily coated with a hard mineral deposit. I tried a lot of different things but finally took it off mechanically with wet 1500/2000 grit paper. That worked ok, but left the obvious hazy results, which I am now trying to clear up. The last issue on this project is that I have no financial support of any kind for this project. So what ever will work is what I'll do, but cheaper is better! Thanks, Richard Lamb My last project used NOVUS #3 for starters followed by #2 for the remaining fine scratches. NOVUS makes a #1 wax but I think McGuire's #10 is a lot better. I don't think there is any magic to these products, just a lot of hard work. (If you think you are done. you aren't.) Don't get tempted to use any power tools. Work slowly with muscle power. Plan a couple of full days to complete each step. Bill Daniels |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
"Richard Lamb" wrote in message ... Bill Daniels wrote: I bought some expensive paper based polishing towels from a plastics company. They were touted as the 'perfect' acrylic cleaning rag. Unfortunately, they scratched a test piece of plexy just like any paper towel. The common advice to use only soft cloth rags seems to be well founded. I have polished out scratched canopies and to do it right is a LOT of work. Best to never get them scratched in the first place. There are some good scratch removing polishing compounds available but I always wind up with McGuire's #10 as the final wax. #10 takes a lot of work to do it right but the wax is exactly the same refractive index as Plexiglas so the remaining scratches disappear. There is a story going around that #10 leaves the canopy statically charged which attracts dust. I've never seen this if the polish job is done according to the label instructions. Bill Daniels Thanks for the wax recomendation, Bill. Would you go into more detail on the scratch _removal_ stuff. I have a 1968 Hughes OH6A that I'm restoring for display (non-flying) at the new Army Aviation museum. When I got her, the right side of the bubble was heavily coated with a hard mineral deposit. I tried a lot of different things but finally took it off mechanically with wet 1500/2000 grit paper. That worked ok, but left the obvious hazy results, which I am now trying to clear up. The last issue on this project is that I have no financial support of any kind for this project. So what ever will work is what I'll do, but cheaper is better! Thanks, Richard Lamb My last project used NOVUS #3 for starters followed by #2 for the remaining fine scratches. NOVUS makes a #1 wax but I think McGuire's #10 is a lot better. I don't think there is any magic to these products, just a lot of hard work. (If you think you are done. you aren't.) Don't get tempted to use any power tools. Work slowly with muscle power. Plan a couple of full days to complete each step. Bill Daniels Aw fudge. I have already started with Novus #2 - and doing it by hand. People are gonna see that huge right arm and jump to the wrong conclusions! Richard (wax on - wax off) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pacplyer wrote:
Richard Lamb wrote in message ... pacplyer wrote: JIM WEIR wrote "CLIP IT!" p.s. Microwave towels are the dumbest thing I've ever heard of. Just take a bowl of water and nuke it for four minutes. Wait a while so you don't loose your vision to water explosions. Microwave cleans off like nothing. Or be stupid and spend your money on microwave towels. It's the same thing. How's that for a flame? ;-) Where do I send my bucks? Richard My kind of crowd! I'll be passing a hat around at the next Rutan X-prize launch. ;-) Where'd you learn so much about spacecraft? I'm impressed. By the way Rich, are there any Saturn V or LEM blueprints in existance?; I saw that you hang out at the sci.space groups. I'd kill to get a reproduction to hang up in my hangar. cheers, pac pac Source for orbital trajectories? Principa Mathmatica - Newton. All else follows from that... :^) Heck Pac, nobody believes I dropped out of high school at 17. Nor that I'm considered a 350 credit hour sophmore at 54... For what it's worth, my thesis is to understand exactly WHY the answer to the question of life, the universe, and everything is 42. ( Douglas Adams, who passed away before publishing his research) I found a bunch of detail stuff on Apollo and the LM a while back. My history file only goes back 90 days, must have been longer than that, because it wasn't there when I looked just now. I believe I found that site via a google search for LEM history. But I'll send you some of what I found. Richard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cleaning up brushes/dope? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 5 | June 23rd 11 02:11 AM |
Cleaning up a reamed hole? | Boelkowj | Home Built | 5 | March 25th 04 01:32 AM |
Cleaning the sprayer | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 2 | August 26th 03 03:12 AM |