First NASA form filed

Re- read my post. That is what I said.
--
Jim in NC

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:39:12 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:

Re- read my post. That is what I said.


The post of yours to which I was responding was where you stated:

A trick here is, if you are given clearance to taxi to 31, but have to get
to the opposite side of 31 to get to the taxiway that will take you to the
departure end of 31, you may cross any other runways, but may not cross 31
without clearance.

I did not see in that post any indication that 31 was the "assigned
take-off runway".


--ron

"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote

A trick here is, if you are given clearance to taxi to 31, but have to
get
to the opposite side of 31 to get to the taxiway that will take you to
the
departure end of 31, you may cross any other runways, but may not cross
31
without clearance.

I did not see in that post any indication that 31 was the "assigned
take-off runway".


--ron

You are technically right, but picking at nits. Why else, in context with
the other posts subjects, would anyone not see that when I said, "given
clearance to taxi to 31", it was not the assigned runway.

Geez. You may now have the last word.
--
Jim in NC

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:42:26 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:

You are technically right, but picking at nits. Why else, in context with
the other posts subjects, would anyone not see that when I said, "given
clearance to taxi to 31", it was not the assigned runway.

Geez. You may now have the last word.

Since you insist :-)

Your response seemed to be to my posting, which was dealing, as was the
OP's original message, with taxiing to some place on the field other than
the assigned takeoff runway.


--ron