![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.owning Jon Kraus wrote:
: Our "new" '79 M20J came with a 2 year old Garmin 430 GPS and Garmin 340 : audio panel. The backup radio is an ancient King 170B. I must say that : the reception on the Garmin sucks compared to the 170B. Am I doing I just flew a '77 Arrow with a 430 and a KX170B. The reception on the 170B was FAR superior to that on the 430. I think that the old-timers that designed the 170/175 radios really had a handle on how to take care of low signal strength inputs, while the 430 designers copied the TI databook for a "118 to 135 MHz aircraft transmitter/receiver". Beyond that, the antennas can make a big difference in how a receiver performs. If the old antenna and wiring was re-used for the 430 I would consider rewiring and replacing with new parts. -- Aaron Coolidge |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin 430 Reception | Jon Kraus | Owning | 16 | November 7th 04 03:17 AM |
Garmin 430 VOR reception | Maik | Owning | 7 | September 30th 04 03:49 PM |
Garmin 430 VOR reception | Maik | Piloting | 11 | September 30th 04 03:49 PM |
Garmin 430 VOR reception | Maik | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | September 30th 04 03:48 PM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |