![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3. I have pared our opening page back to practically nothing, yet it STILL
seems to be taking too long to open. I added a new "hit" counter yesterday -- could that be slowing it down so much? (It's www.AlexisParkInn.com if you want to take a gander at it.) How long is it taking to open on your computer? Do you really need a gigantic graphic splash screen? What does it gain you? ??? I've pared the opening page down to being just a collage picture, and not much else. What is "gigantic" about it? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:KCMtd.225691$R05.149415@attbi_s53... That said, I'm not convinced using the phone is any more reliable; we've had plenty of hotel screw-ups, from losing our reservation altogether to minor snafus related to type and location of the room, even booking by phone. This is my main fear with setting up real-time on-line booking. I have this horrible fear that we're going to end up double-booking suites (someone booking it on-line at the same moment that we are booking it on the phone) -- and what will we do then? Is there any way to use the same routine(software) at the registration point(telephone in) in the hotel as the internet connection is using? What I'm thinking is whichever finishes first gets the room. I'll bet you won't come down to a photo finish. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
I turn once again to you, the great internet gurus of aviation, for answers to the mysteries of the web... Yesterday NPR announced that only a third of internet users are connected at high speed, using either DSL or cable. This truly surprised me, and I'm absolutely amazed that so few people have made the jump to high-speed internet -- I could never, ever go back to dial-up, and have been on cable modem for years. Because of this rather shocking statistic I instantly redesigned our webpage so that the home page is smaller and opens more quickly. (According to what Frontpage was telling me, it would have taken several minutes to open over a 28.8 modem!) It never dawned on me to design the page for dial-up, because I thought slow connections were on there way out! I would suggest keeping the site simple enough that it doesn't require huge amounts of bandwidth to display this week, even if huge amounts of bandwidth are actually available. That is the art of web design, keeping the site useful and attractive while keeping bandwidth and processsing requirements down. Even in the age of faster computers and networks, efficiency is still king. If you want to employ special features (including extensive Flash) that require more bandwidth , do so by all means, but they can be an optional part of the webpage that is somehow marked as requiring more bandwidth. Be careful not to confuse Java (a compiled language which requires a virtual machine [translation: more computer resources]) and Javascript. For example, I tend to keep Java disabled since it slows me down when I don't expect it, but almost always keep Javascript enabled. I turn on Java if/when there is a good reason to. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Double-booking sounds like it can happen cuz you're now keeping two sets of
registration books. The key is to keep only one, so option a is any phone registrations would be done thru your on-line system (employee typing it in) and option b is your on-line registrations get posted quickly/immediately to your in-house registration system. Bob Clough "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:KCMtd.225691$R05.149415@attbi_s53... That said, I'm not convinced using the phone is any more reliable; we've had plenty of hotel screw-ups, from losing our reservation altogether to minor snafus related to type and location of the room, even booking by phone. This is my main fear with setting up real-time on-line booking. I have this horrible fear that we're going to end up double-booking suites (someone booking it on-line at the same moment that we are booking it on the phone) -- and what will we do then? For most hotels this wouldn't matter -- one room is as good as the next. But we have people SPECIFICALLY booking the Blackbird Suite (for example) -- and they are NOT going to be satisfied with the Red Baron Suite -- even though they are comparable suites from an amenities standpoint. *sigh* I'm taking a huge risk with this on-line booking contract, but I think it's necessary in order to take us to the next level. Hope we don't end up screwed (up)... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message 1. Does anyone know what the average speed
modem is being used by the 70% of people still using dial-up? I use dial-up because I can access the internet everywhere I travel. Speeds run the spectrum from 24k to 48k. Some hotels have free high-speed which I take advantage of. Some hotels charge for high-speed access which I thumb my nose at with dial-up. How many of you guys actually make real-time, on-line hotel reservations? Don't know about hotels, but the airline I work for averages about 60% of reservations by internet. D. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:43:44 GMT, Jay Honeck wrote:
Hey Jay, 1. Does anyone know what the average speed modem is being used by the 70% of people still using dial-up? 56K would be the best speed one can get on dialup, but in reality, 44K to 52K is what I get on my laptop. 3. I have pared our opening page back to practically nothing, yet it STILL seems to be taking too long to open. I added a new "hit" counter yesterday -- could that be slowing it down so much? (It's www.AlexisParkInn.com if you want to take a gander at it.) How long is it taking to open on your computer? Took less then three seconds on my DSL hookup. I get 300K per second download. How many of you guys actually make real-time, on-line hotel reservations? My gut feel has always been that we would eventually have to jump on this band-wagon, because more and more people are booking on-line. However, this newly released figure, showing such low high-speed internet usage, really makes me wonder if people are actually using on-line bookings much, or if this is a tiny minority using it only occasionally. I would never book a hotel online AGAIN. I did this once, printed out the confirmation number, and showed up at 1:00 p.m. and hotel was booked solid. I would have understood had I been real late arriving, but I did confirm with my credit card to allow for a late arrival. Because it was a small town in Mississippi, I ended up going 15 miles to another town to get overnight accomodations. I also found out, the "Central" reservation computer of this hotel does not always interface timely with the local hotel computers, that causes overbookings as well. Allen |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
Jay Honeck wrote: That said, I'm not convinced using the phone is any more reliable; we've had plenty of hotel screw-ups, from losing our reservation altogether to minor snafus related to type and location of the room, even booking by phone. This is my main fear with setting up real-time on-line booking. I have this horrible fear that we're going to end up double-booking suites (someone booking it on-line at the same moment that we are booking it on the phone) -- and what will we do then? For most hotels this wouldn't matter -- one room is as good as the next. But we have people SPECIFICALLY booking the Blackbird Suite (for example) -- and they are NOT going to be satisfied with the Red Baron Suite -- even though they are comparable suites from an amenities standpoint. *sigh* I'm taking a huge risk with this on-line booking contract, but I think it's necessary in order to take us to the next level. Hope we don't end up screwed (up)... Will this be real-time? Have you considered using the app yourself to do the bookings? That way you won't double book, as you will have the same interface as the customers. -- Remove "2PLANES" to reply. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, availability is a significant obstacle. I live 1/2 mile from city
water and sewer and 15 miles from Research Triangle Park NC (15,000+ high tech workers) all for the priviledge of living on an airport. No DSL service. TimeW Cable arrived 2.5 years ago but they placed their box too far from my house. So when I wanted high speed cable, I had to pay $700 to get a drop off their drop. A significant obstacle. (BTW, TWC gave me data service without TV service). Others nearby are in same boat and don't have high speed access. We use the internet to find hotels but rarely to book. We are usually looking for location (airport) and services level. Price we rely on phone negotiations. If we don't get what we want, we wait several hours and call again. Speed and browsers. I just had to reload a system after 8 months of use due to spyware. They took over despite attempts to remove with various tools. Made IE run like mud. We now use Mozilla and run a variety of anti-virus and anti-spyware programs. Clean so far. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you really need a gigantic graphic splash screen? What does it gain
you? What is "gigantic" about it? -- The amount of screen real estate it takes up. Jose -- Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hamish Reid wrote:
Javascript -- which actually isn't much related to Java -- is very useful, almost universally available and used, and quite lightweight, and is used mostly for smallish effects (field format checking, rollovers, etc.). We always recommend to our clients that JS is useful for certain effects, but it should not be something on which a site is dependant. One particular client took our advice, and used JS for a little timer on a training system. It's cute, and even useful. And it is the single largest source of support calls. Problems with JS are just that frequent (and annoying). [...] It loaded instantly ... except for that damn counter, which took many seconds. These are silly, true, but the delay is indicative of some problem. BTW, some have recommended staying aware from tools like Flash or Java. But a hotel site - esp. one with distinct rooms - is an ideal use of one of the "view the space" tools. It could be as simple as a video of a walk-through, but I like the tools which permit one to navigate one's self. They'll be useless to anyone on a slow connection, but they could be a real sales aid for the bandwidth wealthy. - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lycoming 290g Questions | Mike | Home Built | 3 | December 5th 04 06:05 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
FWD: Look at this internet patch for Microsoft Internet Explorer | Charles S | Home Built | 15 | October 2nd 03 08:08 PM |
Millionaire at 31... on the Internet. Listen to how he's doing it. | ower | Home Built | 0 | August 2nd 03 10:23 AM |