![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Moore" wrote in message . 121... "kage" wrote Vr is normally higher than V1 (but not always), it cannot be less than V1. Isn't that a "mutually exclusive" statement. I guess V1 and Vr could be the same, I've never seen that. B-727-200...V1 and Vr were normally the same. If Vr is the same as some other "V" speed it is usually the same as V2. I don't see how that can be considering the "speed increment" required by the following from FAR Part 25: (c) V2, in terms of calibrated airspeed, must be selected by the applicant to provide at least the gradient of climb required by §25.121(b) but may not be less than- (2) VR plus the speed increment attained (in accordance with §25.111(c)(2)) before reaching a height of 35 feet above the takeoff surface; Bob Moore ATP B-727 B-707 PanAm (retired) Vr and V2 are always the same in a Falcon 50, a part 25 airplane. Go figure! I never got to fly something big. Best, Karl ATP BE-300 CE-500 LR-Jet DA-50 Helicopter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Challenger Crashe at TEB | Jon Kraus | Owning | 78 | February 11th 05 01:10 AM |
Need details on a Challenger 602 | Bob Moore | Piloting | 14 | December 6th 04 08:28 PM |
Challenger forum | Dico Reyers | Home Built | 0 | December 30th 03 06:48 PM |
Ignoring the Challenger? | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | July 1st 03 10:24 AM |