A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ATC Altimeter Settings



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 4th 05, 04:32 PM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message =
...
=20
"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
...
=20
In the Rockies, there are ground stations at widely varying =

elevations.
I've guessed that ATC might not use settings from airports in deep =

valleys
for enroute settings, wherever more representative values are =

available.
=20
How would a station be more representative if it was/wasn't in a =

valley or
on a hill top?
=20


In the case of non-standard lapse rates, the lower the airport,
the more the altimeter differs from true height across mountain peaks.

  #2  
Old April 4th 05, 04:43 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John R. Copeland wrote:

In the case of non-standard lapse rates, the lower the airport,
the more the altimeter differs from true height across mountain peaks.


Lapse rate is temp and has little effect on the altimeter setting.
Because you are already separated from the ground by 2000 feet it is
much more important that everybody have the same setting. No such thing
as an area altimeter setting.


  #3  
Old April 4th 05, 07:49 PM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Newps" wrote in message =
...
=20
John R. Copeland wrote:
=20
In the case of non-standard lapse rates, the lower the airport,
the more the altimeter differs from true height across mountain =

peaks.
=20
Lapse rate is temp and has little effect on the altimeter setting.=20
Because you are already separated from the ground by 2000 feet it is=20
much more important that everybody have the same setting. No such =

thing=20
as an area altimeter setting.


I think you could say lapse rate has *no* effect on altimeter setting.
QNH is whatever it takes to make the altimeter read right on the =
airport.
Lapse rate departure from standard, however, is the major contributor
to any difference between true height and altimeter reading aloft.
Humidity is a minor contributor by comparison.

  #4  
Old April 5th 05, 01:05 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lapse rate is lapse rate, whether the station is 2000 feet higher or lower.

"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
...
"Newps" wrote in message
...

John R. Copeland wrote:

In the case of non-standard lapse rates, the lower the airport,
the more the altimeter differs from true height across mountain peaks.


Lapse rate is temp and has little effect on the altimeter setting.
Because you are already separated from the ground by 2000 feet it is
much more important that everybody have the same setting. No such thing
as an area altimeter setting.


I think you could say lapse rate has *no* effect on altimeter setting.
QNH is whatever it takes to make the altimeter read right on the airport.
Lapse rate departure from standard, however, is the major contributor
to any difference between true height and altimeter reading aloft.
Humidity is a minor contributor by comparison.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pressure Altitude and Terminology Icebound Piloting 0 November 27th 04 09:14 PM
Local altimeter at BFM Dan Luke Instrument Flight Rules 3 June 15th 04 02:01 PM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Tony Naval Aviation 290 March 7th 04 07:58 PM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Guy Alcala Military Aviation 265 March 7th 04 09:28 AM
Altimeter experience HankC Piloting 2 July 25th 03 09:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.