![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message =
... =20 "John R. Copeland" wrote in message ... =20 In the Rockies, there are ground stations at widely varying = elevations. I've guessed that ATC might not use settings from airports in deep = valleys for enroute settings, wherever more representative values are = available. =20 How would a station be more representative if it was/wasn't in a = valley or on a hill top? =20 In the case of non-standard lapse rates, the lower the airport, the more the altimeter differs from true height across mountain peaks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John R. Copeland wrote: In the case of non-standard lapse rates, the lower the airport, the more the altimeter differs from true height across mountain peaks. Lapse rate is temp and has little effect on the altimeter setting. Because you are already separated from the ground by 2000 feet it is much more important that everybody have the same setting. No such thing as an area altimeter setting. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps" wrote in message =
... =20 John R. Copeland wrote: =20 In the case of non-standard lapse rates, the lower the airport, the more the altimeter differs from true height across mountain = peaks. =20 Lapse rate is temp and has little effect on the altimeter setting.=20 Because you are already separated from the ground by 2000 feet it is=20 much more important that everybody have the same setting. No such = thing=20 as an area altimeter setting. I think you could say lapse rate has *no* effect on altimeter setting. QNH is whatever it takes to make the altimeter read right on the = airport. Lapse rate departure from standard, however, is the major contributor to any difference between true height and altimeter reading aloft. Humidity is a minor contributor by comparison. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lapse rate is lapse rate, whether the station is 2000 feet higher or lower.
"John R. Copeland" wrote in message ... "Newps" wrote in message ... John R. Copeland wrote: In the case of non-standard lapse rates, the lower the airport, the more the altimeter differs from true height across mountain peaks. Lapse rate is temp and has little effect on the altimeter setting. Because you are already separated from the ground by 2000 feet it is much more important that everybody have the same setting. No such thing as an area altimeter setting. I think you could say lapse rate has *no* effect on altimeter setting. QNH is whatever it takes to make the altimeter read right on the airport. Lapse rate departure from standard, however, is the major contributor to any difference between true height and altimeter reading aloft. Humidity is a minor contributor by comparison. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
Local altimeter at BFM | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | June 15th 04 02:01 PM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Tony | Naval Aviation | 290 | March 7th 04 07:58 PM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 265 | March 7th 04 09:28 AM |
Altimeter experience | HankC | Piloting | 2 | July 25th 03 09:43 PM |