A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Two Lock Rule?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 18th 05, 07:38 PM
nrp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AES -

If you aren't going into business - somebody should. I think it is a
neat idea although it would need a way to detect that the electronic
box is being crunched or shot at etc etc.

Cool------

  #2  
Old May 18th 05, 08:03 PM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The easy way to do that is with a positive signal system. That is, the
little transmitter chirps once every couple of seconds when things are
"good". When it stops chirping (batteries low, shot, crunched, or alarm
triggered) you light the alarm fuse.

Jim




"nrp" wrote in message
oups.com...
AES -

If you aren't going into business - somebody should. I think it is a
neat idea although it would need a way to detect that the electronic
box is being crunched or shot at etc etc.

Cool------



  #3  
Old May 19th 05, 04:35 AM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

RST Engineering wrote:
The easy way to do that is with a positive signal system. That is, the
little transmitter chirps once every couple of seconds when things are
"good". When it stops chirping (batteries low, shot, crunched, or alarm
triggered) you light the alarm fuse.


That's not very expandable. If the system gets popular, you'd need lots of
frequencies; otherwise your alarm might fail to sound when your item is stolen
because someone else close by is on the same frequency.

George Patterson
"Naked" means you ain't got no clothes on; "nekkid" means you ain't got
no clothes on - and are up to somethin'.
  #4  
Old May 19th 05, 05:35 AM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Then you chirp a digital code. A simple 16 bit code gives you 64K discrete
addresses. Ain't that many airplanes on the field at Oshkosh at one time.

Jim


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:EPTie.9665$E05.6247@trndny09...
RST Engineering wrote:
The easy way to do that is with a positive signal system. That is, the
little transmitter chirps once every couple of seconds when things are
"good". When it stops chirping (batteries low, shot, crunched, or alarm
triggered) you light the alarm fuse.


That's not very expandable. If the system gets popular, you'd need lots of
frequencies; otherwise your alarm might fail to sound when your item is
stolen because someone else close by is on the same frequency.

George Patterson
"Naked" means you ain't got no clothes on; "nekkid" means you ain't
got
no clothes on - and are up to somethin'.



  #5  
Old May 19th 05, 05:20 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote

That's not very expandable. If the system gets popular, you'd need lots of
frequencies; otherwise your alarm might fail to sound when your item is

stolen
because someone else close by is on the same frequency.


Nah, yah gotta think digital. It has to be chirping your digital code, not
just frequencies.
--
Jim in NC

  #6  
Old May 20th 05, 06:14 AM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 19 May 2005 00:20:04 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


"George Patterson" wrote

That's not very expandable. If the system gets popular, you'd need lots of
frequencies; otherwise your alarm might fail to sound when your item is

stolen
because someone else close by is on the same frequency.


Nah, yah gotta think digital. It has to be chirping your digital code, not
just frequencies.


And when you get two on the same frequency is it possible for one to
swamp the other. If you use something like WiFi to set off an alarm,
or call home, that's different as the networking *should* take care of
collissions and multiple systems can coexist on the same frequency.


Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #7  
Old May 18th 05, 10:26 PM
AES
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
"nrp" wrote:

AES -

If you aren't going into business - somebody should. I think it is a
neat idea although it would need a way to detect that the electronic
box is being crunched or shot at etc etc.

Cool------


Thanks!

One could also get more complicated and have the lock and the remote
system in continuous wireless communication, to make sure the lock is
still intact -- but then there are more ways for the false alarm rate to
go up.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reading back altimeter settings? Paul Tomblin Piloting 31 April 12th 05 04:53 PM
FAA Mandatory Pilot Retirement Rule Challenged Larry Dighera Piloting 0 March 20th 05 08:56 PM
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. Larry Dighera Piloting 0 February 22nd 04 03:58 PM
One door PaulaJay1 Owning 17 January 1st 04 12:02 AM
Hei polish moron also britain is going to breach eu deficit 3% rule AIA Military Aviation 0 October 24th 03 11:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.