![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The current installations of the G1000 and Avidyne systemes only have a
single AHRS. You could still likely use them for charter though a redundant AHRS, as planned for the Mustang, would be a good idea. Any equippage for jets less than at least a single Flight Management System (FMS) is rudimentary and probably lacks RSVM and other important capabilities. A G-1000 is great in a Cessna 182, but not so red hot in a jet that goes to flight levels. I don't think you are comparing apples to apples. The Mustang G1000 system will not be as limited as the 182's. I have a lot to say about Cessna that is negative, but I haven't yet seen anything that would lead me to believe that they are going to produce an unsafe jet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question on Garmin GNC 250XL | Ron | Home Built | 1 | October 24th 04 08:26 AM |
Another Garmin 430 question | Jim | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | December 1st 03 11:53 PM |
Garmin 430 question | smf | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | December 1st 03 03:03 AM |
avionics book reference and question | mah | Military Aviation | 14 | October 5th 03 01:17 AM |
Garmin 430/530 Questions | Steve Coleman | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 28th 03 09:04 PM |