![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The engine is worth it's core value only - the log book is what makes
an engine CERTIFIED... Call TCM and ask them what it will cost to get the engine certified again - and hold on to your wallet... denny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going to disagree with Denny and say it's not nearly that bad. The
engine is certified if it has the appropriate data plate (seemingly without regard to what is attached to the data plate G). However, if indeed there are NO logs, then at this precise moment the engine (and hence the aircraft) are not airworthy. Basically all you are going to need to make it airworthy is a sheet of paper from the AI that did the last annual, with the annual engine signoff. That done, and without evidence of anything to the contrary, you are legal to fly. [And don't say that because there is no log book that you don't know if anything was done since annual to make it unairworthy. Those are independent events, and the logbook is only one slight way you might discover such a change.] Now... the money items: Without proper logbook documentation, it is harder to sell the plane. Not a big problem if you plan to keep the plane a long time (by which time you will have probably gone through an overhaul anyway), but still an issue. Second, you have no record of exactly what is installed in the engine. The last annual AI will be attesting to all the AD's performed as of that time, but you have no formal record that they were properly carried out. Future AI *could* (and very likely might) insist that some work be done to verify the AD's before signing off on the next annual. And you might find yourself doing extensive work (splitting the case) just to find that your engine didn't even fall under some AD in the future. Can you make a NEW logbook? Sure, done all the time. You start by trying to get copies of the last overhaul records, plus whatever the manufacturer might still have on that specific serial number. Ditto the accessories. Then take all the receipts, invoices, etc. And you make up what you can. Perfectly legal... but doesn't really solve all the problems above. Me? I would start with the negotiating position that the engine is due for overhaul and reduce the price as if the engine was at TBO. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As others have pointed out (and I won't belabor their points) this is not
true. Jim "Denny" wrote in message ups.com... The engine is worth it's core value only - the log book is what makes an engine CERTIFIED... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, simple enough to find out for sure... He can call the FSDO and
ask them if he makes up a logbook is the engine airworthy... Be interesting for him to report back to us... I'm always willing to learn... denny |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Denny wrote: Well, simple enough to find out for sure... He can call the FSDO and ask them if he makes up a logbook is the engine airworthy... Be interesting for him to report back to us... I'm always willing to learn... There's really no requirement to have a logbook for the engine at all. There are record keeping requirements, but they don't specify you have to have everything in some type of book. That said, to be airworthy, all of the ADs on the engine have to be signed off somewhere. While reciepts with hours and details of work might be informative, unless they are properly signed off (unlikely), that doesn't satisfy the requirements. I would think that you'd have to get the proper signoffs before the engine was airworthy. This might be a simple as having the original signer recreate the entries in a new logbook, or as difficult as having all applicable ADs performed again. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Denny" writes:
Well, simple enough to find out for sure... He can call the FSDO and ask them if he makes up a logbook is the engine airworthy... Be interesting for him to report back to us... I'm always willing to learn... Why do you think "the logbook" is needed? Can you point out where the FARs speak of "logbook"? What are the FAR stated requirements for this "logbook"? How long must one keep this "logbook"? -jav |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airplanes are bought and sold every day with some/all the logs missing.
It does not affect airworthiness, just the value. Denny wrote: Well, simple enough to find out for sure... He can call the FSDO and ask them if he makes up a logbook is the engine airworthy... Be interesting for him to report back to us... I'm always willing to learn... denny |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message ... Airplanes are bought and sold every day with some/all the logs missing. It does not affect airworthiness, just the value. Which is what the OP was asking --- how much would they discount the value. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depends. The real value is the airframe log. I wouldn't really care
much about the engine or prop log. Matt Barrow wrote: "Newps" wrote in message ... Airplanes are bought and sold every day with some/all the logs missing. It does not affect airworthiness, just the value. Which is what the OP was asking --- how much would they discount the value. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm, lots of opinions...
In spite of contrary opinions from folks in the group, until the engine is found to be airworthy I will continue to maintain that engine has core value only... He can't prove that the connecting rod numbers are correct, that the bearing numbers are correct, that the internal bolts were correctly torqued, and on, and on - and there is no signature attesting that the field repairs (overhaul) done meets the manufacturer's specs (it takes more than the data plate on the case to be a certified airworthy engine)... Now, some of our august mechanic members are making noises like they would be willing to sign their license # that the engine is airworthy... But, I wonder if they actually would if it was in their shop??? The bottom line is that the engine has to be opened up, part numbers verified, parts measured for manufacturers tolerances, AD's verified, and then reassembled, and someone has to put his professional license on the line by signing a log of the work done and declaring the engine airworthy... Probably what Jim/Newps, maybe $3000 for labor, plus gaskets? Not a big deal, but it has to be done... If I were considering buying the plane, the purchase offer would include that work as a contingency... And I haven't seen anything about the prop log? Just remember Jack, the old adage - fall in love and you get screwed in the end... denny denny |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Missing engine | Marty Schmidt | Piloting | 3 | October 27th 04 09:03 PM |
Engines and Reliability | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 13 | June 30th 04 03:27 PM |
My Engine Fire!! | [email protected] | Piloting | 21 | April 2nd 04 05:02 PM |
Engine... Overhaul? / Replace? advice please | text news | Owning | 11 | February 17th 04 04:44 PM |
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |