A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Leaning Procedure for a Carbureted 182



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 29th 05, 07:17 AM
Howard Nelson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I fly a C182P with O470S. Recently read the engine management and leaning
articles on AVWEB prior to a long (1200NM) cross country. I have a 6
cylinder analyzer with CHT and EGT for each cylinder. Cruising at 7500ft I
would lean to about 75-100 ROP on the first cylinder to peak. I would have a
large descrepancy between EGT temps between the cylinders due to uneven
distribution of fuel air mixture in the O470S. I then tried a trick
mentioned in those articles. I would back off the throttle until MP just
noticably fell (about 1/4 inch MP). After a couple of minutes the EGT's were
all within 25 degrees of each other. The idea put forward in the article was
that by partially closing the throttle the turbulence created resulted in
more even distribution of fuel. Don't know if there is any rational basis of
this but seemed to work in my plane.

Howard


  #2  
Old June 29th 05, 08:30 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard,

After a couple of minutes the EGT's were
all within 25 degrees of each other.


Just to make something clear about a common misunderstanding he The
goal is NOT to have the EGTs equal. The goal is to have the EGTs in
equal distance from their respective peak. The absolute EGT value
doesn't matter.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #3  
Old June 29th 05, 08:46 PM
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A couple of observations. If you are running rich of peak, you want ALL
they cylinders to be rich of peak and you use the leanest, highest temp
cylinder as your guide. If you are running lean of peak, you want all
the cylinders to be lean of peak, and you use the RICHEST, highest temp
cylinder as your guide. One can see why it is good to have all they
cylinders close to each other. This is what the Gami's do.

As for carb heat. If you put on the carb heat you introduce hot air,
which is less dense. You have just richened the mixture.

As for throttle pull back. If you lean to roughness, then pull back the
throttle, you have just richened the mixture.

There is no magic. You can safely operate at high power setting rich of
peak or lean of peak. To operate lean of peak you need (or want)
EGT/CHT monitoring of all cylinders, fuel injection, Gamis and fuel
flow monitoring to REALLY do it right. You MIGHT be able to operate
lean of peak successfully with a carbureted engine, but most can't
because of uneven air and fuel distribution.

If you operate at about 50% power you can run as lean as you want
because you won't be generating enough heat to do any damage. 65% power
takes 50 degrees rich (or lean), 75% takes 100 degrees rich (or lean),
85% 150 degrees rich (or lean) etc.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Leaning for taxi Jim Rosinski Piloting 28 September 12th 04 03:53 AM
Procedure Turn Bravo8500 Instrument Flight Rules 65 April 22nd 04 03:27 AM
Unusual Procedure at DFW Toks Desalu Piloting 9 December 17th 03 05:27 PM
O-320 leaning Roger Long Piloting 5 November 8th 03 11:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.