Leaning Procedure for a Carbureted 182

Juan,

Then talk to your priest and switch bibles, kiddo,

"Kiddo", huh? So now all you have left is to become condescending? Usenet is
just so much fun.

because the data on this
web does not support your assertions. It's not even close.

Guess you need reading lessons, kiddo (see, I can do it, too).

Heck, you didn't
even bother to check to see if the engine that is the subject of this thread
is on the approved list for the GAMI products!

The subject of the thread went from a specific engine to general leaning
procedures real quick (read it). I NEVEr claimed that GAMIjectors were for
O-470s. The general principles still hold. And your claim of "richer is cooler"
is still not true.


Sorry to shoot you down like that,

Excuse me?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...

because the data on this
web does not support your assertions. It's not even close.

Guess you need reading lessons, kiddo (see, I can do it, too).

But you can't back it up with facts, kiddo. I can.

Heck, you didn't
even bother to check to see if the engine that is the subject of this
thread
is on the approved list for the GAMI products!

The subject of the thread went from a specific engine to general leaning
procedures real quick (read it). I NEVEr claimed that GAMIjectors were for
O-470s. The general principles still hold. And your claim of "richer is
cooler"
is still not true.

The subject of this thread never left the issue of leaning carbureted
engines before you started talking about LOP leaning. LOP is only for some
fuel injected engines, and only those with very exact fuel metering and the
right hardware to monitor what's going on in each cylinder. And now you're
saying I'm claiming richer is cooler? chuckle I had no idea you liked
musical chairs so much. I guess the shoe does fit.

Sorry to shoot you down like that,

Excuse me?

Pick up your parachute before you leave the room. I made my point, I'm outta
here. :P

Juan

Juan,

I made my point


You did? To my eye, it looks more like you said "I'm right, you're
not", started the insults when I didn't agree and now just plain leave.
To you, that may be "making a point", to me it is kindergarten. But,
suit yourself.

PS: Still waiting for data on that acid theory of yours.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Juan Jimenez wrote:

The subject of this thread never left the issue of leaning carbureted
engines before you started talking about LOP leaning. LOP is only for some
fuel injected engines, and only those with very exact fuel metering and the
right hardware to monitor what's going on in each cylinder.

I'll repeat my quibble I previously mentioned on this thread...

If you said most carbureted engines can't run LOP, then I would agree.

However, the Continental E-225 (with a Bendix PS-5C carburetor) in my
Bonanza will run LOP. While not a 0-470, its a pretty durn close
(virtually the same displacement). I do have a JPI with fuel flow on
this installation and would be happy to send anybody a download of a
flight demostrating this.

Also LOP operations were the standard airline procedure with the large
radials in DC-4/DC-6 days. Those were decidedly carbed engines.

--
Frank Stutzman
Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl"
Hood River, OR