![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a comfortable glider (both physically and mentally comfortable),
there really isn't much difference between 3 and 6 hours. In fact, after an undercalled task, landing after only 3 hours sometimes seems like a relight! Compared to long flights in power planes (boooring, unless at 500 ft and 500 knots, or 100 ft and 100 knots), it always amazes me how fast 6 hours can go by on a really fun (fast, high, low stress) soaring flight. On the other hand, anything over an hour in an uncomfortable (physically) glider is torture. I really enjoy flying 1-26s, but almost all the ones I've flown have been rentals and none have fit very well - so there was never any problem in deciding to land after an hour or two. Water? Because it feels so goood! Like a big heavy Cadillac, cruising along nice and fast...and faster means you can cover more ground and see more scenery before you land, not to land earlier. Finally, a 500 k downwind is a lot more of an endurance test than a 500 k O&R - that 500 k drive back is really tiring! Kirk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airbus A380 water purification | john smith | Piloting | 1 | July 7th 05 02:50 AM |
Induction System Water Problem | Mike Spera | Owning | 1 | January 30th 05 05:29 AM |
Water, water, everywhere, but none for thirsty wings.... | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 0 | November 21st 04 03:14 PM |
Questions regarding Air/Oil Separators | Doodybutch | Owning | 6 | April 20th 04 05:56 PM |
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 09:41 AM |