![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And after discussing it with the rotary engine gang, the consensus is..
that you pass through this area of "chatter" fairly quickly.. either you are engine driving prop.. or prop driving engine... but from a practical matter you are not loitering in the power/thrust range that is teetering between the two. Every geared engine passes through this range several times on a given flight, but rarely loiters there. Even in ground ops.. you are pushing.. or pulling.. but rarely straddling the fence. Dave Morgans wrote: "Dave S" wrote in message nk.net... Wouldn't you have this "effect" ANY time you went from a thrusting to a braking action with regards to thrust generated? If I pulled power back, set the pitch to flat, and pushed the nose over, wouldn't the prop be "driving" the engine in the manner you describe? All of this is able to be done without a specific Beta range. Dave Actually, no. Kinda. g When the engine is using HP to turn the prop, all is well, be it forward or reverse thrust. The only difference the gearing sees is the thrust on the shaft goes from pulling the shaft out, to pushing the shaft in, but the load on the gears is the same. (all for tractor applications, in this case) When the possible chattering comes in, is when you are gliding, and at a very low power setting, and the *windmilling* prop is trying to turn the engine, thus the prop is "making" HP to try to turn the engine- opposite from normal. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess my point was that, whenever I have been with someone using beta,
they spent lots of time loitering there. Positive thrust to get moving then hanging out in the zero thrust area with little adjustments positive and negative during taxi. I think I would hesitate to use a geared engine for taxing that way (like turbine planes do) "Dave S" wrote in message nk.net... And after discussing it with the rotary engine gang, the consensus is.. that you pass through this area of "chatter" fairly quickly.. either you are engine driving prop.. or prop driving engine... but from a practical matter you are not loitering in the power/thrust range that is teetering between the two. Every geared engine passes through this range several times on a given flight, but rarely loiters there. Even in ground ops.. you are pushing.. or pulling.. but rarely straddling the fence. Dave Morgans wrote: "Dave S" wrote in message nk.net... Wouldn't you have this "effect" ANY time you went from a thrusting to a braking action with regards to thrust generated? If I pulled power back, set the pitch to flat, and pushed the nose over, wouldn't the prop be "driving" the engine in the manner you describe? All of this is able to be done without a specific Beta range. Dave Actually, no. Kinda. g When the engine is using HP to turn the prop, all is well, be it forward or reverse thrust. The only difference the gearing sees is the thrust on the shaft goes from pulling the shaft out, to pushing the shaft in, but the load on the gears is the same. (all for tractor applications, in this case) When the possible chattering comes in, is when you are gliding, and at a very low power setting, and the *windmilling* prop is trying to turn the engine, thus the prop is "making" HP to try to turn the engine- opposite from normal. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "PittsS1C" wrote Positive thrust to get moving then hanging out in the zero thrust area with little adjustments positive and negative during taxi. I think I would hesitate to use a geared engine for taxing that way (like turbine planes do) I can't say with 100% authority, but I don't see that as a problem. Just because there is zero thrust, does not mean the engine/gearbox has zero load. Even at beta, the prop is still moving a lot of air, but off of the front and the back and ends of the prop, at the same time. Considerable HP is still being used, and putting a constant, normal load on the gears. Think of a "club" prop, for breaking in engines, or using on a "torque" type dyno. It is indeed putting a load on the engine and gearbox, but it is not trying to make thrust, so the test stand/dyno doesn't zoom down the length of the driveway. g -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave S" wrote And after discussing it with the rotary engine gang, the consensus is.. that you pass through this area of "chatter" fairly quickly.. either you are engine driving prop.. or prop driving engine... but from a practical matter you are not loitering in the power/thrust range that is teetering between the two. All very true. You get pressure of the opposite side of the gears from normal, but it would indeed be rare for it to get to the RPM where it is so closely balanced, as to go from one to the other, rapidly. All of this is reason to make the gears tight fitting, with little lash. More lash gives time for the motion to set up with a "head start", providing more force to break things. Broken things = bad. g -- Jim in NC -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 10:18 PM |
Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:04 AM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop | Larry Smith | Home Built | 21 | September 26th 03 07:45 PM |