![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:57:18 -0400, Morgans wrote:
"Jim Carriere" wrote It's handy (beta) during taxiing when you can get no or slight reverse thrust, that saves your brakes and is less workload when you get the hang of it. It's usually a bad idea to reverse taxi- kick up fod then roll through it as the engine ingests it, hard to see where you're going, the nose (or tail) wheel may not castor 360 degrees... to name a few reasons. It is also -really- handy for seaplanes, who have *no* brakes. ;-)) But, having a prop with a beta or reverse capability adds new very nasty failure modes. Type certificated aircraft with props that have a beta or reverse functionality have additional complicated monitors to prevent the prop from going into uncommanded beta or reverse in flight. I would want a prop with the low pitch stop set to a position that is safe for in-flight operation. If the prop goes into beta or reverse in the air it can kill you. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit) Ottawa, Canada http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/ e-mail: khorton02(_at_)rogers(_dot_)com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 10:18 PM |
Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:04 AM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop | Larry Smith | Home Built | 21 | September 26th 03 07:45 PM |