A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"position & hold" going away



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 18th 05, 03:51 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

Why can't the incoming pilot see you and go around?


Is the threshold always visible to the pilot for all aircraft when
in normal landing configuration?

--
Bob Noel
no one likes an educated mule

  #2  
Old August 18th 05, 04:50 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...

Is the threshold always visible to the pilot for all aircraft when
in normal landing configuration?


In conditions where a pilot in position could see an approaching aircraft,
except for very short final, yes.


  #3  
Old August 18th 05, 11:48 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

Is the threshold always visible to the pilot for all aircraft when
in normal landing configuration?


In conditions where a pilot in position could see an approaching aircraft,
except for very short final, yes.


Then why did one airliner land on top of a commuter (iirc) a number of years ago?

--
Bob Noel
no one likes an educated mule

  #4  
Old August 18th 05, 11:51 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...

Then why did one airliner land on top of a commuter (iirc) a number of
years ago?


Were the conditions such that a pilot in position could see an approaching
aircraft?


  #5  
Old August 18th 05, 12:03 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

Then why did one airliner land on top of a commuter (iirc) a number of
years ago?


Were the conditions such that a pilot in position could see an approaching
aircraft?


My understanding is that the airport was VFR at at the time.

--
Bob Noel
no one likes an educated mule

  #6  
Old August 18th 05, 12:22 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...

My understanding is that the airport was VFR at at the time.


Let me know when you're sure.


  #7  
Old August 18th 05, 03:24 PM
Ben Hallert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Let me know when you're sure.


http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...1MA018A&rpt=fa
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...1MA018A&rpt=fi

16 miles reported visibility, 30000 scattered. That should qualify as
VFR for most people.

Ben Hallert
PP-ASEL

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Position and Hold at uncontrolled field dave Piloting 42 February 26th 04 01:25 AM
Hold "as published"? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 83 November 13th 03 03:19 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.