Why an NDB approach with a miss to an intersection?

In article ,
ArtP wrote:


That lightning bolt to SHEDD says the controller can identify it.

How do you know that's what it means? I don't doubt you, just can't
find the info/definition on the lightning bolt symbol.

--
Dale L. Falk

There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.

http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html

On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:48:47 -0900, Dale wrote:

In article ,
ArtP wrote:


That lightning bolt to SHEDD says the controller can identify it.

How do you know that's what it means? I don't doubt you, just can't
find the info/definition on the lightning bolt symbol.

I suspect that piece of trivia is buried somewhere in a King course.
But if you look at an approach plate labeled RADAR REQUIRED (BWI ILS
28), you will only see that symbol associated with the word "RADAR".
The only time I have seen that symbol not accompanied by the word
"RADAR" is on approaches which are legal with only an NDB or single
VOR. On these the symbol is always associated with an intersection
that would require DME or a second VOR to identify.

"ArtP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:48:47 -0900, Dale wrote:

In article ,
ArtP wrote:

That lightning bolt to SHEDD says the controller can identify it. So
it is perfectly legal to fly the approach with just an NDB as long as
you are in radio contact with ATC.

How do you know that's what it means? I don't doubt you, just can't
find the info/definition on the lightning bolt symbol.

I suspect that piece of trivia is buried somewhere in a King course.
But if you look at an approach plate labeled RADAR REQUIRED (BWI ILS
28), you will only see that symbol associated with the word "RADAR".

Not at all. Look at BED ILS 29--radar required, and JAYSE and MORIS have
the jagged symbol, but no "RADAR" label.

With all due respect, it's pretty dangerous to assign operational
significance to an approach-chart symbol by guesswork or by suspected King
trivia, if the symbol doesn't appear in the legend for the chart. There's
really nothing to indicate that the jagged symbol is anything other than an
arrow pointing from the name to the fix.

--Gary

"ArtP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:48:47 -0900, Dale wrote:

In article ,
ArtP wrote:

That lightning bolt to SHEDD says the controller can identify it. So
it is perfectly legal to fly the approach with just an NDB as long as
you are in radio contact with ATC.

How do you know that's what it means? I don't doubt you, just can't
find the info/definition on the lightning bolt symbol.

I suspect that piece of trivia is buried somewhere in a King course.
But if you look at an approach plate labeled RADAR REQUIRED (BWI ILS
28), you will only see that symbol associated with the word "RADAR".

Not at all. BED ILS 29, for example, is a radar-required approach with the
jagged symbol at JAYSE and MORIS, but there's no "RADAR" label at those
fixes.

With all due respect, it's dangerous to attribute operational significance
to an approach-chart symbol by guesswork or by suspected King trivia, if the
symbol does not appear in the legend for the chart. There's no indication
that a jagged line in the plan view does anything other than connect the
name to the fix.

--Gary

ArtP wrote:

I suspect that piece of trivia is buried somewhere in a King course.
But if you look at an approach plate labeled RADAR REQUIRED (BWI ILS
28), you will only see that symbol associated with the word "RADAR".
The only time I have seen that symbol not accompanied by the word
"RADAR" is on approaches which are legal with only an NDB or single
VOR. On these the symbol is always associated with an intersection
that would require DME or a second VOR to identify.

I suspect it is some chart makers way of tagging the name to the fix.