question on student taxi practice

As far as the practicality of it goes, I'm not sure I see the point of
having a student practice taxiing solo.

Taildragger?

Jose
--
Nothing takes longer than a shortcut.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
om...
Taildragger?

As far as I'm concerned, the type of airplane is irrelevant to the question.

Taildragger?
As far as I'm concerned, the type of airplane is irrelevant to the question.

It bears on the skill required for taxiing, and the possible reasons for
solo taxi practice before solo flight.

Jose
--
Nothing takes longer than a shortcut.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

An instructor can sit in an airplane and monitor student
skill, this is what instruction is, protect the student from
their errors while they gain experience. First explain,
then demonstrate, then practice. Critique, practice,
eventually skill develops. Then solo, with a logbook and
certificate endorsement. Still, no passengers and a flight
check at least every 90 days in each make and model.

For a certificated land pilot, 90% of the seaplane rating is
how to taxi, sail and dock, beaching, and the rules of water
navigation. Yet no seaplane instructor would allow a
student to practice solo in the seaplane, yet if the
instructor in a land plane or seaplane is just sitting
there, not flying or riding the controls, the student is
effectively "solo." When the student has demonstrated skill
and judgment, the instructor takes the steps to advance the
student to the next level.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

"Jose" wrote in message
t...
| Taildragger?
| As far as I'm concerned, the type of airplane is
irrelevant to the question.
|
| It bears on the skill required for taxiing, and the
possible reasons for
| solo taxi practice before solo flight.
|
| Jose
| --
| Nothing takes longer than a shortcut.
| for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

For a certificated land pilot, 90% of the seaplane rating is
how to taxi, sail and dock, beaching, and the rules of water
navigation. Yet no seaplane instructor would allow a
student to practice solo in the seaplane

Then you'd agree that the ability to taxi a land plane (on land) has
little bearing on the ability to taxi a seaplane (on water). One
without the skills to solo a seaplane could very easily have the skills
to taxi a land plane (or even fly it).

One without the skills to fly any kind of plane could still have the
skills to taxi a nosewheel landplane safely solo (but not have the
skills to taxi a tailwheel landplane safely solo).

This gets down to instructor judgement, and the type of plane (sea,
land, nosewheel, ski) makes a difference in what would be considered
good judgement.

Jose
--
Nothing takes longer than a shortcut.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

I think it is always "bad instructor judgment" to allow a
student who has not yet soloed and been properly endorsed to
operate an airplane of any type or configuration as the only
occupant of the airplane. Whether the student has the skill
or judgment to taxi a trike, tailwheel, seaplane or
skiplane, they are NOT yet good enough to do so until they
have enough skill and experience to rate the solo
endorsement. Now, if they are on an island about to be hit
by a tidal wave and there are just enough planes and seats
to take everybody to safety and one lane has to be flown
solo by a student pilot, your exercise emergency authority
and go.

The skill required to taxi is vitally important to flying,
you can't take-off or land without taxiing. You can crash
during taxi. The FAA/NTSB accident and incident reports
indicate that taxiing is a very hazardous area of operation.
So for me, students are either dual or endorsed and
supervised.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Jose" wrote in message
t...
| For a certificated land pilot, 90% of the seaplane rating
is
| how to taxi, sail and dock, beaching, and the rules of
water
| navigation. Yet no seaplane instructor would allow a
| student to practice solo in the seaplane
|
| Then you'd agree that the ability to taxi a land plane (on
land) has
| little bearing on the ability to taxi a seaplane (on
water). One
| without the skills to solo a seaplane could very easily
have the skills
| to taxi a land plane (or even fly it).
|
| One without the skills to fly any kind of plane could
still have the
| skills to taxi a nosewheel landplane safely solo (but not
have the
| skills to taxi a tailwheel landplane safely solo).
|
| This gets down to instructor judgement, and the type of
plane (sea,
| land, nosewheel, ski) makes a difference in what would be
considered
| good judgement.
|
| Jose
| --
| Nothing takes longer than a shortcut.
| for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

Whether the student has the skill
or judgment to taxi a trike, tailwheel, seaplane or
skiplane, they are NOT yet good enough to do so until they
have enough skill and experience to rate the solo
endorsement.

I disagree. Maybe we need to just agree to disagree, but I'd like to
know how the lack of skill in flying through the air (solo) affects the
ability to excercise good judgement at ten knots on the ground on a calm
day (we don't know that it wasn't a nice day, and you are making an
absolute pronouncement)

.... and I don't see the connection between this and getting a 12 year
old girl pregnant.

Jose
--
Nothing takes longer than a shortcut.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
t...
It bears on the skill required for taxiing, and the possible reasons for
solo taxi practice before solo flight.

Why should a taildragger pilot be MORE in need of solo taxi practice than a
nosewheel pilot?

If anything, the taildragger pilot is in more need of supervision.