![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Although I agree the only way to ensure a healthy engine life is frequent flying and frequent oil change, I somehow thinks that 180F oil temp thing is an urban myth. If you have a plane that flies twice a week for one hour each, getting oil change every 25 hr, and the oil temp never gets above 160F due to an oil cooler that's a bit too effective, I don't see any evidene that such an engine will be any more prone to corrosion than a similarly operated engine with oil temp at 180F. Even if you have your oil temp at 180F cruising at 7500, the temp will drop quite a bit once your start the descend. Does it mean you will collect a lot of water in your crankcase right after you pull back the power? My point is it's meaningless to be obsessive about the 180F. Just go fly often, and change the oil frequently. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well stated. The temperature of the oil is measured at only one place. The
temperature of the oil varies greatly within the engine. It is probably hottest when it leaks off the cylinders. It is coolest exiting the oil cooler. A reading of 180 or 160 might mean that oil is above the boiling point at many points inside the engine. Also with the oil being atomized by the slinging in the crankcase, water will evaporate at a good rate while below the boiling point. I would love to see some scientific data on the evaporation rate vs. oil temp. "M" wrote in message oups.com... Although I agree the only way to ensure a healthy engine life is frequent flying and frequent oil change, I somehow thinks that 180F oil temp thing is an urban myth. If you have a plane that flies twice a week for one hour each, getting oil change every 25 hr, and the oil temp never gets above 160F due to an oil cooler that's a bit too effective, I don't see any evidene that such an engine will be any more prone to corrosion than a similarly operated engine with oil temp at 180F. Even if you have your oil temp at 180F cruising at 7500, the temp will drop quite a bit once your start the descend. Does it mean you will collect a lot of water in your crankcase right after you pull back the power? My point is it's meaningless to be obsessive about the 180F. Just go fly often, and change the oil frequently. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
soxinbox wrote
Also with the oil being atomized by the slinging in the crankcase, water will evaporate at a good rate while below the boiling point. Bravo Sir! Brilliant! Even at 1500 rpm, there is a hurricane of wind in the crankcase that would make Katrina seem like a Summer breeze. And at 60-90 psi of oil pressure, the oil is being pumped through the engine like a firehose. Who said it is just sitting in the bottom of the pan? I would love to see some scientific data on the evaporation rate vs. oil temp. So would I! Rusty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Water in our oil, or just alot of hot air? | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | April 24th 06 05:30 AM |
Airbus A380 water purification | john smith | Piloting | 1 | July 7th 05 02:50 AM |
Induction System Water Problem | Mike Spera | Owning | 1 | January 30th 05 05:29 AM |
Water, water, everywhere, but none for thirsty wings.... | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 0 | November 21st 04 03:14 PM |
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 09:41 AM |