![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Drew Dalgleish wrote: Running an engine on the ground is bad. It's boring and wastes gas just go do some circuits to get the oil warm. What proof is there that it is bad? And sometimes weather and circumstances don't allow people to fly. I believe that ground running is better than bare metal corroding. My engine would have been corroded a long time ago if the oil from a ground run would do that, and it hasn't been. Blue skies, Rusty One of the things we (at an auto company) have to do is make sure that cars cold start well. And, nowadays, we even have to meet emission regulations at lower temperatures. Now, the problem is that it's hard to get a lot of cold starts into a short period of time. So, what to do? One technique is to use cold fluids (water, oil, even air) to force cool an engine and get multiple cold starts per day. When some dynomometers were set up to do cold start after cold start, we started to grenade the engines in short order - largely due to oil dilution from gasoline - you get some in the crank case with every start and if you don't warm up, it builds up. Moisture from blowby builds up too. Repeated short starts are, in general, not a good thing. What you propose isn't nearly as severe, but short, repeated runs are not likely to get you to the maximum TBO. There's nothing magic about 180 degrees - but the warmer it is, the higher the vapor pressure from the water, and the more it dries out. Aircraft engines are at a bit of a disadvantage since they still just use a breather tube so the only "air" going into the crankcase is from the blowby which is loaded with water and CO2 (all engines have blowby - it's just a question of how much). The positive flow from the PCV system on cars has been shown to increase the longevity of the engines, but just sticking one on an aircraft engine won't have the same benifit since aircraft run at high manifold pressures (little or no vacuum) for extended times so you wouldn't get much flow from a PCV so all you can do is warm it up enough and run it long enough for things to dry out. Oil needs to be changed because the long chain hydrocarbons break down and viscosity changes. Also, there are a lot of additives for friction and wear reduction, foam supression, etc. that tend to break down. Carbon particles are not a problem for gasoline engines since there is almost no soot generated. Diesel's on the other hand, make lots of soot, and some of it makes it's way into the oil. If you really want to circulate some oil, crank without starting . If you want to run it, run it long enough to warm up. Short runs aren't an instant disaster, but they really aren't what you want to do for a long TBO. But, it's your engine... -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good Post, Captain!
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Water in our oil, or just alot of hot air? | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | April 24th 06 05:30 AM |
Airbus A380 water purification | john smith | Piloting | 1 | July 7th 05 02:50 AM |
Induction System Water Problem | Mike Spera | Owning | 1 | January 30th 05 05:29 AM |
Water, water, everywhere, but none for thirsty wings.... | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 0 | November 21st 04 03:14 PM |
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 09:41 AM |