![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberman wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:25:46 GMT, Matt Whiting wrote: See earlier message of mine on landing on grass, but one should always know the soil of the intended grass runway and taxi with the yoke full back. Even when taxiing back after landing into a 30K headwind? 30 knot head wind doesn't reduce the weight on the nose wheel on taxiing, so yes, you still need yoke full aft, just less power, But when you are taxiing back after landing that 30 knot headwind is now a 30 knot tailwind. Holding full up elevator with that strong a tailwind will put a lot more weight on the nosewheel and may even flip the airplane on its nose. You did learn proper control positioning for taxiing in strong windds during your primary instruction didn't you? Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:47:11 GMT, Matt Whiting wrote:
But when you are taxiing back after landing that 30 knot headwind is now a 30 knot tailwind. Holding full up elevator with that strong a tailwind will put a lot more weight on the nosewheel and may even flip the airplane on its nose. You did learn proper control positioning for taxiing in strong windds during your primary instruction didn't you? Duh, good point :-) Helps to read you did say taxiing back... Allen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberman wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:47:11 GMT, Matt Whiting wrote: But when you are taxiing back after landing that 30 knot headwind is now a 30 knot tailwind. Holding full up elevator with that strong a tailwind will put a lot more weight on the nosewheel and may even flip the airplane on its nose. You did learn proper control positioning for taxiing in strong windds during your primary instruction didn't you? Duh, good point :-) Helps to read you did say taxiing back... Yes, and that is why I'm against teaching pilots to fly using techniques that aren't required for the conditions. If you get a low-time pilot all jazzed up thinking that he needs to treat every grass strip like a peat bog, then he's going to be focused on keeping that elevator back in his gut as he taxis back. And as soon as he turns around after the landing roll-out, he's going to start moving like a banshee on the hard surface since he's using so much throttle to keep the nosewheel from digging in. Then he'll back off the throttle to slow down since the field isn't really soft. However, dollars to donuts he won't think to simultaneously release the nosewheel. Once the airflow from the prop is gone and not offseting the tail wind, bad things can happen. That is why I'm fairly adamant that a pilot should fly the conditions that exist, not some hypothetical condition that is likely to exist less than 5% of the time, which is probably about how often a grass field is also a soft field. And you can almost always find out when that 5% occurs by either watching the weather or calling ahead to the field. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nevada County (Grass Valley) Airport - local transport? | bk | General Aviation | 2 | January 26th 05 11:51 PM |
Greasy Grass | George Shirley | Naval Aviation | 1 | October 30th 04 06:20 PM |
Mooney M20 K on Grass ? | vfr2003 | Owning | 10 | August 18th 04 04:18 PM |
Mooney M20 K on Grass ? | Andrew Boyd | Owning | 0 | August 13th 04 03:00 PM |
Buildng a grass airstrip | Yosef Mendelsohn | General Aviation | 3 | May 13th 04 05:44 AM |