CAT IIIC minimums

"Andrey Serbinenko" wrote in message
...
I have to disagree with you on that: I believe the omission of certain
approach minimums equates to a statement that such approach is not
authorized.
On the same plate (KJFK 4R CAT III), there's no circling minimums, and
this
doesn't obviously imply that circling with no visibility limitation is
allowed.

Sure, but if CAT III approaches inherently preclude circling (which I
suspect is the case), then the omission of visibility minima for CAT III
circling approaches isn't analogous. (I haven't seen an example of a CAT I,
LOC, VOR or NDB approach plate that does not either specify circling minima,
or say explicitly that circling is NA.)

--Gary

Gary Drescher wrote:
(I haven't seen an example of a CAT I,
LOC, VOR or NDB approach plate that does not either specify circling minima,
or say explicitly that circling is NA.)


Circling isn't authorized at KLAX and some other major airports, simply
by not having a circle-to-land minima box on the chart. The source
document, however, does state "NA" in the line for circling minimums.

"Sam Spade" wrote in message
news:1QKBg.656$0F5.46@fed1read04...
Gary Drescher wrote:
(I haven't seen an example of a CAT I,
LOC, VOR or NDB approach plate that does not either specify circling
minima, or say explicitly that circling is NA.)


Circling isn't authorized at KLAX and some other major airports, simply by
not having a circle-to-land minima box on the chart. The source document,
however, does state "NA" in the line for circling minimums.

Yup, you're right.

--Gary

Gary Drescher wrote:



Circling isn't authorized at KLAX and some other major airports, simply by
not having a circle-to-land minima box on the chart.

Just like you ain't never gonna do a published missed.

Newps wrote:


Gary Drescher wrote:



Circling isn't authorized at KLAX and some other major airports,
simply by not having a circle-to-land minima box on the chart.


Just like you ain't never gonna do a published missed.

Just like?