TSA training requirements for CFIs

"Jose" wrote in message
t...
So, if you are wanted for murder should they flag your DL?

No, if I am wanted for murder, I don't want to get caught.

I have no problem with certain things being flags on the DL - murder being
one example. However, the list is too easy to expand. Terrorism? (based
on TSA's secret criteria?) Child molestation? Skinny dipping? Skinny
dipping with children? Your children?

Drug lords? Drug mules? Suspicion of pot smoking? Neighbor complaints
about unkempt lawns and "strange smells"?

There is due process, but I've seen that due process abused too often for
me to be comfortable allowing the authorities to flag common activities.
For that matter, why not flag credit cards, library cards, and
Stop-and-shop cards? It would be extremely effective, and not a bad
deterrent to boot.


How about "people who are wanted for breaking the law?" That will cover both
people wanted for INS violations and murders.

How about "people who are wanted for breaking the law?" That will cover both
people wanted for INS violations and murders.

And jaywalkers.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

Jose wrote:
So, if you are wanted for murder should they flag your DL?

No, if I am wanted for murder, I don't want to get caught.

I have no problem with certain things being flags on the DL - murder
being one example. However, the list is too easy to expand. Terrorism?
(based on TSA's secret criteria?) Child molestation? Skinny dipping?
Skinny dipping with children? Your children?


What about "overstayed visa and the INS wants you deported"?

-Robert

Jose wrote:
How about "people who are wanted for breaking the law?" That will cover both
people wanted for INS violations and murders.

And jaywalkers.

So if someone has an outstanding warrent for jaywalking you do not want
that information provided to law enforcement persons when they run a
warrent check on you???

-Robert

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ps.com...

Jose wrote:
How about "people who are wanted for breaking the law?" That will cover
both
people wanted for INS violations and murders.

And jaywalkers.

So if someone has an outstanding warrent for jaywalking you do not want
that information provided to law enforcement persons when they run a
warrent check on you???

-Robert


If the person has an outstanding warrant and hasn't paid the fine or
no-showed for court why not. Do you think the state has no right to use
methods to capture those who break its laws?

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
So if someone has an outstanding warrent for jaywalking you do not want
that information provided to law enforcement persons when they run a
warrent check on you???

-Robert


If the person has an outstanding warrant and hasn't paid the fine or
no-showed for court why not. Do you think the state has no right to use
methods to capture those who break its laws?

You're preaching to the choir.

-Robert

Many states believe that allowing the INS to
flag a driver's license in a threat to privacy.

I think I agree with them.

That is ridiculous!

In that case, the DL should not be flagged, or checked, for any infraction.
The flags are there to catch people who are breaking the law, and bring them
to justice. Last I heard, it is against the law to be in this country
without valid and current, permission from INS, if you are an alien.

I also can't believe that kalifornia kooks would issue a DL to an illegal
alien. They are all crazy, IMHO.
--
Jim in NC

How about "people who are wanted for breaking the law?" That will cover
both
people wanted for INS violations and murders.

And jaywalkers.

Now you are just being inflamitory.

Why is everything so black and white for you?

There will always be some gray areas, but us *rational* people (notice I am
not including you) can surely see that immigration violations and jaywalking
are of a totally different nature.
--
Jim in NC

Jose wrote:


There is due process
There's no due process anymore.

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ps.com...
Jose wrote:
How about "people who are wanted for breaking the law?" That will cover
both
people wanted for INS violations and murders.
And jaywalkers.
So if someone has an outstanding warrent for jaywalking you do not want
that information provided to law enforcement persons when they run a
warrent check on you???

-Robert


If the person has an outstanding warrant and hasn't paid the fine or
no-showed for court why not. Do you think the state has no right to use
methods to capture those who break its laws?


The problem is, some of the laws they are enforcing aren't
Constitutional and no one has done a damn thing about it.