A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rotation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 11th 06, 03:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Rotation

Depends on where you have the trim set which is always a compromise. If the
trim is set so that there is no nose down trimming required after takeoff,
then it will take quite a bit of pull to get the aircraft to rotate and in
the initial climb. If the aircraft is trimmed so that only a moderate
amount of force is required to rotate then it will require pushing on the
yoke and retrimming after takeoff as the airplane accelerates.

The trim setting is correct for one speed and configuration (power and flap)
and since the airplane is accelerating, the trim is going to need to be
changed.

Mike
MU-2


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Do real aircraft abruptly pitch upward on take-off during rotation, or
is this an artifact of my simulator? I find that I must put the stick
forward slightly as soon as the nose rises, or I risk a tail strike.
This is especially true on small aircraft, such as the Baron 58.
Large jets seem to do the same thing, but at a slower speed. I am
curious as to whether real aircraft are the same way, and if so, what
the proper way is to rotate to minimize wild movements.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.



  #2  
Old September 11th 06, 05:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Rotation


Mike Rapoport wrote:
Depends on where you have the trim set which is always a compromise. If the
trim is set so that there is no nose down trimming required after takeoff,
then it will take quite a bit of pull to get the aircraft to rotate and in
the initial climb. If the aircraft is trimmed so that only a moderate
amount of force is required to rotate then it will require pushing on the
yoke and retrimming after takeoff as the airplane accelerates.

The trim setting is correct for one speed and configuration (power and flap)
and since the airplane is accelerating, the trim is going to need to be
changed.


Mike,
I think trim is just academic is MSFS because there is no control
feedback. The OP is probably setting the elevator with too much back
pressure but doesn't know it because he doesn't have the feedback.
Honestly, if you asked me what position the yoke is in on take off, I
probably couldn't tell you. In real life we expect the yoke to go to
its trim position, something that doesn't make sense in a simulator
that does not have feedback controls.
-Roebrt

  #3  
Old September 11th 06, 07:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Rotation

Robert M. Gary writes:

I think trim is just academic is MSFS because there is no control
feedback.


You don't need control feedback to see the response of the aircraft
out the window and with the instruments, although you can get it with
a force-feedback joystick. It is true that anything that requires
gradual control inputs or depends on a sensation of motion or other
physical feedback is difficult to simulate without advanced hardware.

The OP is probably setting the elevator with too much back
pressure but doesn't know it because he doesn't have the feedback.
Honestly, if you asked me what position the yoke is in on take off, I
probably couldn't tell you. In real life we expect the yoke to go to
its trim position, something that doesn't make sense in a simulator
that does not have feedback controls.


You're saying the yoke moves on its own?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #4  
Old September 11th 06, 08:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default Rotation


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message

You're saying the yoke moves on its own?



In an actual aircraft, yes -- in a manner of speaking. At a point on the
takeoff roll prior to actual takeoff, the elevator (or stabilator) starts
to "fly"when it acquires enough airflow to force a response. When that
happens, the yoke will move from wherever it was (usually full down in small
planes with manual controls) to whatever position is defined as neutral for
that particular speed, as determined by the trim tab setting.


  #5  
Old September 11th 06, 08:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Rotation

John Gaquin writes:

In an actual aircraft, yes -- in a manner of speaking. At a point on the
takeoff roll prior to actual takeoff, the elevator (or stabilator) starts
to "fly"when it acquires enough airflow to force a response. When that
happens, the yoke will move from wherever it was (usually full down in small
planes with manual controls) to whatever position is defined as neutral for
that particular speed, as determined by the trim tab setting.


That seems logical. Unfortunately my joystick has only springs for
feedback, and that feedback is fixed.

However, I do notice a change in the view out the window and sometimes
the artificial horizon as speed increases, if I have the stick
substantially forward or backward, so the effects are indeed being
simulated, even if I can't feel them.

I suppose force-feedback might help, but I don't know how reliable or
durable those are, and they can be expensive (and they are hard to
find).

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old September 12th 06, 02:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Skywise
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 140
Default Rotation

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in news:1157992218.361147.166330
@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

Snipola
Mike,
I think trim is just academic is MSFS because there is no control
feedback. The OP is probably setting the elevator with too much back
pressure but doesn't know it because he doesn't have the feedback.
Honestly, if you asked me what position the yoke is in on take off, I
probably couldn't tell you. In real life we expect the yoke to go to
its trim position, something that doesn't make sense in a simulator
that does not have feedback controls.
-Roebrt


I have a force feedback stick and if I don't trim right for
the phase of flight I'm in I have to provide excessive input
to maintain flight attitude. As I adjust the trim the feedback
moves the stick. Trim buttons are on my stick. I can press
them while lightly holding the stick and feel the stick move.
I know I am in trim when the stick is centered and I have a
feather touch on the stick.

When properly trimmed I can let go of the stick and maintain
flight attitude for 10's of seconds. I can even conrol climb
and descent with power adjustment without ever touching the
elevator. Or sometimes I maintain altitude with single clicks
of trim.

Before I got the force feedback stick, trim didn't make sense
since you couldn't feel it in the controls.

The hundred bucks I spent on mine were well worth the enhanced
simulation experience. Flight is much smoother and landings
are greased much more often.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
  #7  
Old September 12th 06, 06:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Rotation

Skywise writes:

Before I got the force feedback stick, trim didn't make sense
since you couldn't feel it in the controls.

The hundred bucks I spent on mine were well worth the enhanced
simulation experience. Flight is much smoother and landings
are greased much more often.


What brand and model of stick was this? And has it been reliable?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #8  
Old September 12th 06, 09:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Rotation

Mxsmanic,

What brand and model of stick was this?


Oh? All of a sudden we have the money, eh?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #9  
Old September 17th 06, 05:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Skywise
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 140
Default Rotation

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Skywise writes:

Before I got the force feedback stick, trim didn't make sense
since you couldn't feel it in the controls.

The hundred bucks I spent on mine were well worth the enhanced
simulation experience. Flight is much smoother and landings
are greased much more often.


What brand and model of stick was this? And has it been reliable?


It's a Microsoft Force Feedback 2. It's been a while since I
bought it so it may not even be made anymore.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
  #10  
Old September 17th 06, 01:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Rotation

Skywise writes:

It's a Microsoft Force Feedback 2. It's been a while since I
bought it so it may not even be made anymore.


I note that PMDG recommends that you not use force feedback with their
aircraft. According to them, it's so far from the real aircraft that
it does more harm than good (at least for the large aircraft that they
model).

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The danger of assumption Jay Honeck Piloting 26 September 15th 05 12:37 PM
Thermal Rotation - Revisited.... Mark Zivley Soaring 3 July 3rd 04 02:11 PM
Fighter takeoff rotation Boomer Military Aviation 10 March 17th 04 06:43 PM
Cessna 150 Price Outlook Charles Talleyrand Owning 80 October 16th 03 02:18 PM
Airmen in Europe may go back to three-month rotation schedules Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 22nd 03 11:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.