A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

You're Not Going To Believe This: Another Cirrus Is Down (Statesville, NC)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 28th 06, 09:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default You're Not Going To Believe This: Another Cirrus Is Down (Statesville, NC)

In article ,
"Kyle Boatright" wrote:

One of the local flight schools from a
towered field teaches B-52 style approaches in their C-172's. That makes
sense for someone who is just attempting his/her first landings, but once
the student has the landing thing figured out, the instructor(s) really,
really need to retrain their students to fly a tighter pattern.


It's much easier to teach somebody the right way the first time.
  #2  
Old October 28th 06, 09:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Don Tuite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 319
Default You're Not Going To Believe This: Another Cirrus Is Down (Statesville, NC)

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:42:01 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:

In article ,
"Kyle Boatright" wrote:

One of the local flight schools from a
towered field teaches B-52 style approaches in their C-172's. That makes
sense for someone who is just attempting his/her first landings, but once
the student has the landing thing figured out, the instructor(s) really,
really need to retrain their students to fly a tighter pattern.


It's much easier to teach somebody the right way the first time.


Isn't this the "stabilized approach" rubric carried to an extreme?

Don
  #3  
Old October 28th 06, 10:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dudley Henriques
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 269
Default You're Not Going To Believe This: Another Cirrus Is Down (Statesville, NC)


"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Kyle Boatright" wrote:

One of the local flight schools from a
towered field teaches B-52 style approaches in their C-172's. That makes
sense for someone who is just attempting his/her first landings, but once
the student has the landing thing figured out, the instructor(s) really,
really need to retrain their students to fly a tighter pattern.


It's much easier to teach somebody the right way the first time.


I totally agree. I've shunned the hard, rigid, and non-flexible approach to
flight instruction from day 1. Its fine to have an established datum for a
specific task, and indeed, all instructors should use some kind of lesson
plan as all flight schools should set specific standards and procedures, but
along with this, a good CFI has to include flexibility and common sense all
through the learning curve.
Pilots are well taught from the very beginning that the ability to work a
plan while maintaining a flexible approach to working that plan is one of
the most important assets a pilot can attain through training.
Dudley Henriques


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trip report: Cirrus SR-22 demo flight Jose Piloting 13 September 22nd 06 11:08 PM
Cirrus demo Dan Luke Piloting 12 December 4th 05 05:26 AM
Iced up Cirrus crashes Dan Luke Piloting 136 February 16th 05 07:39 PM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. C J Campbell Piloting 122 May 10th 04 11:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.