A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question on Baron 58 prop control



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 28th 06, 01:47 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Allen writes:

As Jim said the PW PT6 engine has no physical connection between the power
section and the drive section.


How does power get from one to the other?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old November 28th 06, 02:10 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
TheSmokingGnu
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 166
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Mxsmanic wrote:
How does power get from one to the other?


The turbine's output over a second series of fan blades, which are
connected to the propeller shaft. In effect, it's a giant torque
converter (if you're at all familiar with car technology).

In fact, you can hold, with your bare hand, the prop blade during start
up. Just don't let go of it, and don't try to catch it if it comes
loose! (Oh, and RUN!)

Is a feathered prop
always edge to the wind, or flat to the wind


Edge to the wind. The thought is that the engine has already failed in
some capacity, and a windmilling prop causes massive cavitation and
drag, so the blade edge is aligned with the relative wind to stop it
from turning (although not fully, due to mechanical positioning issues,
they get really, really close).
  #3  
Old November 28th 06, 02:27 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Barrie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control


"TheSmokingGnu" wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
How does power get from one to the other?


The turbine's output over a second series of fan blades, which are
connected to the propeller shaft. In effect, it's a giant torque converter
(if you're at all familiar with car technology).


Interesting. Is that what gave rise to the old slang term "Propjet"?

How does this compare with the present form of propulsion, such as in the
B747, which I've heard being called "Fanjet"? Is it the same but turbine
blades replace propellor blades while serving a similar function?

Barrie


  #4  
Old November 28th 06, 04:04 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Barrie writes:

How does this compare with the present form of propulsion, such as in the
B747, which I've heard being called "Fanjet"? Is it the same but turbine
blades replace propellor blades while serving a similar function?


Essentially, yes. A turbofan is a jet engine with a very large front
fan in a duct. This fan, which is driven by a turbine in the
combustion section that in turn is driven by hot exhaust gases,
provides most of the thrust. It's like a many-bladed propeller in a
duct (whence the term "ducted fan," which is occasionally used). It's
much more efficient than a pure turbojet, and it also has advantages
over an open prop. It's the preferred mode of propulsion for
commercial airliners these days.

However, turbofans don't work well at transonic and supersonic speeds,
although I understand that these problems have been fixed in recent
years. Likewise, they don't have significant advantages for low speed
flight like that of a small GA plane.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #5  
Old November 30th 06, 03:11 PM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Kingfish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 470
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control


Mxsmanic wrote:

However, turbofans don't work well at transonic and supersonic speeds,
although I understand that these problems have been fixed in recent
years. Likewise, they don't have significant advantages for low speed
flight like that of a small GA plane.


Turbofans work very well at transonic & SS speeds. The engines in the
F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22, F-35 (you get the idea) are turbofans (w/
afterburners). The F-22 engines are so efficient they allow supersonic
flight without the burners lit (supercruise) The difference is they are
low-bypass turbofans compared to the big high-bypass engines on
transport category aircraft - (Boeing, Airbus)

Turbines burn lotsa fuel at low altitudes and are most efficient at
high alts, which normally requires pressurization. Your typical GA
plane doesn't fly at high enough altitudes to get the most benefit from
turbine power.

  #6  
Old December 3rd 06, 05:26 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control


"Kingfish" wrote

Mxsmanic wrote:

However, turbofans


Turbines burn lotsa


You had to give in to the dark side, huh?

So sorry. :-(
--
Jim in NC
  #7  
Old November 28th 06, 02:45 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
BT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 995
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Allen writes:

As Jim said the PW PT6 engine has no physical connection between the
power
section and the drive section.


How does power get from one to the other?

air pressure


  #8  
Old November 28th 06, 03:52 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Air mass
"BT" wrote in message
...
|
| "Mxsmanic" wrote in message
| ...
| Allen writes:
|
| As Jim said the PW PT6 engine has no physical
connection between the
| power
| section and the drive section.
|
| How does power get from one to the other?
|
| air pressure
|
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question on prop cycle Frode Berg Owning 9 April 25th 06 06:36 AM
Prop Balancing Question A Lieberman Owning 3 February 1st 06 11:25 PM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
IVO props... comments.. Dave S Home Built 16 December 6th 03 11:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.