![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allen writes:
As Jim said the PW PT6 engine has no physical connection between the power section and the drive section. How does power get from one to the other? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
How does power get from one to the other? The turbine's output over a second series of fan blades, which are connected to the propeller shaft. In effect, it's a giant torque converter (if you're at all familiar with car technology). In fact, you can hold, with your bare hand, the prop blade during start up. Just don't let go of it, and don't try to catch it if it comes loose! (Oh, and RUN!) ![]() Is a feathered prop always edge to the wind, or flat to the wind Edge to the wind. The thought is that the engine has already failed in some capacity, and a windmilling prop causes massive cavitation and drag, so the blade edge is aligned with the relative wind to stop it from turning (although not fully, due to mechanical positioning issues, they get really, really close). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "TheSmokingGnu" wrote in message ... Mxsmanic wrote: How does power get from one to the other? The turbine's output over a second series of fan blades, which are connected to the propeller shaft. In effect, it's a giant torque converter (if you're at all familiar with car technology). Interesting. Is that what gave rise to the old slang term "Propjet"? How does this compare with the present form of propulsion, such as in the B747, which I've heard being called "Fanjet"? Is it the same but turbine blades replace propellor blades while serving a similar function? Barrie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barrie writes:
How does this compare with the present form of propulsion, such as in the B747, which I've heard being called "Fanjet"? Is it the same but turbine blades replace propellor blades while serving a similar function? Essentially, yes. A turbofan is a jet engine with a very large front fan in a duct. This fan, which is driven by a turbine in the combustion section that in turn is driven by hot exhaust gases, provides most of the thrust. It's like a many-bladed propeller in a duct (whence the term "ducted fan," which is occasionally used). It's much more efficient than a pure turbojet, and it also has advantages over an open prop. It's the preferred mode of propulsion for commercial airliners these days. However, turbofans don't work well at transonic and supersonic speeds, although I understand that these problems have been fixed in recent years. Likewise, they don't have significant advantages for low speed flight like that of a small GA plane. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: However, turbofans don't work well at transonic and supersonic speeds, although I understand that these problems have been fixed in recent years. Likewise, they don't have significant advantages for low speed flight like that of a small GA plane. Turbofans work very well at transonic & SS speeds. The engines in the F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22, F-35 (you get the idea) are turbofans (w/ afterburners). The F-22 engines are so efficient they allow supersonic flight without the burners lit (supercruise) The difference is they are low-bypass turbofans compared to the big high-bypass engines on transport category aircraft - (Boeing, Airbus) Turbines burn lotsa fuel at low altitudes and are most efficient at high alts, which normally requires pressurization. Your typical GA plane doesn't fly at high enough altitudes to get the most benefit from turbine power. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote Mxsmanic wrote: However, turbofans Turbines burn lotsa You had to give in to the dark side, huh? So sorry. :-( -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Allen writes: As Jim said the PW PT6 engine has no physical connection between the power section and the drive section. How does power get from one to the other? air pressure |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air mass
"BT" wrote in message ... | | "Mxsmanic" wrote in message | ... | Allen writes: | | As Jim said the PW PT6 engine has no physical connection between the | power | section and the drive section. | | How does power get from one to the other? | | air pressure | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question on prop cycle | Frode Berg | Owning | 9 | April 25th 06 06:36 AM |
Prop Balancing Question | A Lieberman | Owning | 3 | February 1st 06 11:25 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |