![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air mass
"BT" wrote in message ... | | "Mxsmanic" wrote in message | ... | Allen writes: | | As Jim said the PW PT6 engine has no physical connection between the | power | section and the drive section. | | How does power get from one to the other? | | air pressure | | |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barrie writes:
How does this compare with the present form of propulsion, such as in the B747, which I've heard being called "Fanjet"? Is it the same but turbine blades replace propellor blades while serving a similar function? Essentially, yes. A turbofan is a jet engine with a very large front fan in a duct. This fan, which is driven by a turbine in the combustion section that in turn is driven by hot exhaust gases, provides most of the thrust. It's like a many-bladed propeller in a duct (whence the term "ducted fan," which is occasionally used). It's much more efficient than a pure turbojet, and it also has advantages over an open prop. It's the preferred mode of propulsion for commercial airliners these days. However, turbofans don't work well at transonic and supersonic speeds, although I understand that these problems have been fixed in recent years. Likewise, they don't have significant advantages for low speed flight like that of a small GA plane. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug writes:
And that is why a sim will NEVER be like true flight. With a sim, if you crash, you crashed and you are ok. With a real airplane, you crashed, and that's IT! No more you. A different headspace, attitude, whatever you want to call it. A good simulator can very rapidly make you forget that it's just a simulator. This is hard with MSFS because it doesn't move or provide the physical environment of a cockpit, but if it did, you'd start mistaking it for real pretty quickly. Even as it is, it can be stressful when things go wrong in the sim environment. If you prefer risking your life for real, that's your choice. Personally, I see that as a drawback to real flight, not an advantage. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug" wrote in news:1164680980.670569.130090
@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com: And that is why a sim will NEVER be like true flight. With a sim, if you crash, you crashed and you are ok. With a real airplane, you crashed, and that's IT! No more you. A different headspace, attitude, whatever you want to call it. Hey Doug, Having been there done this with Mx (sim vs real world), you are wasting your time with Mx as he is a troll (as you will note from his reply to you). Just check out his recent postings and you will clearly see this. You just may want to ignore Mx's postings and reply to those who really appreciate the time you take in answering their questions. Thanks! Allen |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert,
I honestly haven't had the time to install it. Well, let's hope you at least have the 15 Gig (!) of free HD space it requires. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Mxsmanic posted:
Doug writes: And that is why a sim will NEVER be like true flight. With a sim, if you crash, you crashed and you are ok. With a real airplane, you crashed, and that's IT! No more you. A different headspace, attitude, whatever you want to call it. A good simulator can very rapidly make you forget that it's just a simulator. This is hard with MSFS because it doesn't move or provide the physical environment of a cockpit, but if it did, you'd start mistaking it for real pretty quickly. I've been in several "real" & full-motion simulators, and none of them confused me about the reality of the experience. It is not the same at all. Neil |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thomas Borchert wrote: Robert, I honestly haven't had the time to install it. Well, let's hope you at least have the 15 Gig (!) of free HD space it requires. So what? Disk space is basicly free nowadays. -Robert |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert,
not in my laptop. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
... Robert, not in my laptop. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) The drives in most laptops are now interchangeable. Check he http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...asp?CatId=1277 |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the Lake "Renagade": amphib can also.... reverse pitch for
stopping and reversing. Dave On 27 Nov 2006 15:24:36 -0800, "Doug" wrote: Some seaplane props are featherable and reversable so the seaplane can stop or backup and so the prop can be used as a brake. I believe the Cessna Caravan in Seaplane config can do this, not sure. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question on prop cycle | Frode Berg | Owning | 9 | April 25th 06 06:36 AM |
Prop Balancing Question | A Lieberman | Owning | 3 | February 1st 06 11:25 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |