A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question on Baron 58 prop control



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 28th 06, 03:52 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Air mass
"BT" wrote in message
...
|
| "Mxsmanic" wrote in message
| ...
| Allen writes:
|
| As Jim said the PW PT6 engine has no physical
connection between the
| power
| section and the drive section.
|
| How does power get from one to the other?
|
| air pressure
|
|


  #22  
Old November 28th 06, 04:04 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Barrie writes:

How does this compare with the present form of propulsion, such as in the
B747, which I've heard being called "Fanjet"? Is it the same but turbine
blades replace propellor blades while serving a similar function?


Essentially, yes. A turbofan is a jet engine with a very large front
fan in a duct. This fan, which is driven by a turbine in the
combustion section that in turn is driven by hot exhaust gases,
provides most of the thrust. It's like a many-bladed propeller in a
duct (whence the term "ducted fan," which is occasionally used). It's
much more efficient than a pure turbojet, and it also has advantages
over an open prop. It's the preferred mode of propulsion for
commercial airliners these days.

However, turbofans don't work well at transonic and supersonic speeds,
although I understand that these problems have been fixed in recent
years. Likewise, they don't have significant advantages for low speed
flight like that of a small GA plane.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #23  
Old November 28th 06, 04:06 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Doug writes:

And that is why a sim will NEVER be like true flight. With a sim, if
you crash, you crashed and you are ok. With a real airplane, you
crashed, and that's IT! No more you. A different headspace, attitude,
whatever you want to call it.


A good simulator can very rapidly make you forget that it's just a
simulator. This is hard with MSFS because it doesn't move or provide
the physical environment of a cockpit, but if it did, you'd start
mistaking it for real pretty quickly.

Even as it is, it can be stressful when things go wrong in the sim
environment.

If you prefer risking your life for real, that's your choice.
Personally, I see that as a drawback to real flight, not an advantage.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #24  
Old November 28th 06, 04:09 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
A Lieberma
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 318
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

"Doug" wrote in news:1164680980.670569.130090
@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com:

And that is why a sim will NEVER be like true flight. With a sim, if
you crash, you crashed and you are ok. With a real airplane, you
crashed, and that's IT! No more you. A different headspace, attitude,
whatever you want to call it.


Hey Doug,

Having been there done this with Mx (sim vs real world), you are wasting
your time with Mx as he is a troll (as you will note from his reply to
you). Just check out his recent postings and you will clearly see this.

You just may want to ignore Mx's postings and reply to those who really
appreciate the time you take in answering their questions.

Thanks!

Allen
  #25  
Old November 28th 06, 08:31 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Robert,

I honestly haven't had the
time to install it.


Well, let's hope you at least have the 15 Gig (!) of free HD space it
requires.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #26  
Old November 28th 06, 12:14 PM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Neil Gould
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 723
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Recently, Mxsmanic posted:

Doug writes:

And that is why a sim will NEVER be like true flight. With a sim, if
you crash, you crashed and you are ok. With a real airplane, you
crashed, and that's IT! No more you. A different headspace, attitude,
whatever you want to call it.


A good simulator can very rapidly make you forget that it's just a
simulator. This is hard with MSFS because it doesn't move or provide
the physical environment of a cockpit, but if it did, you'd start
mistaking it for real pretty quickly.

I've been in several "real" & full-motion simulators, and none of them
confused me about the reality of the experience. It is not the same at
all.

Neil


  #27  
Old November 28th 06, 05:28 PM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control


Thomas Borchert wrote:
Robert,

I honestly haven't had the
time to install it.


Well, let's hope you at least have the 15 Gig (!) of free HD space it
requires.


So what? Disk space is basicly free nowadays.

-Robert

  #28  
Old November 28th 06, 07:17 PM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

Robert,

not in my laptop.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #29  
Old November 28th 06, 11:47 PM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Steve Foley[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 171
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Robert,

not in my laptop.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)


The drives in most laptops are now interchangeable.

Check he

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...asp?CatId=1277





  #30  
Old November 29th 06, 12:43 AM posted to alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Dave[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default Question on Baron 58 prop control

And the Lake "Renagade": amphib can also.... reverse pitch for
stopping and reversing.

Dave


On 27 Nov 2006 15:24:36 -0800, "Doug"
wrote:

Some seaplane props are featherable and reversable so the seaplane can
stop or backup and so the prop can be used as a brake. I believe the
Cessna Caravan in Seaplane config can do this, not sure.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question on prop cycle Frode Berg Owning 9 April 25th 06 06:36 AM
Prop Balancing Question A Lieberman Owning 3 February 1st 06 11:25 PM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
IVO props... comments.. Dave S Home Built 16 December 6th 03 11:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.