![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Lean the mixture until it peaks and then enrichen it (turn it back in) until it drops 50°C. Not necessary the best advice. Remember FULL rich for takeoffs and landings unless your flying at Leadville, CO or some other really high altitude airport. That is actually VERY BAD and DANGEROUS advice! You will need to lean for take-off at density altitudes of 3000 feet or above for max power. Actual airport elevation is irrelevant in this discussion, density altitude is all that matters. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) Ok confession time: I've never been PIC with a controllable prop. 3000 feet density altitude fits with 75% power in the POHs that I recall reading for trainers with fixed pitch props. OTOH, high power levels are available to a higher density altitude with a controllable prop--consult the POH. If the POH is old, consult the engine manufacturer. (I really wish that I could say "consult an instructor or mechanic at the local FBO" ) Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
OTOH, high power levels are available to a higher density altitude with a controllable prop. They are? How would that work? (flying a Tobago with CS prop) -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
... Peter, OTOH, high power levels are available to a higher density altitude with a controllable prop. They are? How would that work? (flying a Tobago with CS prop) -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) Full RPM on a CS prop is usually higher than the fixed pitch prop will allow under most conditions of flight--especially take off and climb. Peter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
Full RPM on a CS prop is usually higher than the fixed pitch prop will allow under most conditions of flight--especially take off and climb. Does that mean higher engine power output or just better conversion of the same engine output? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Peter, Full RPM on a CS prop is usually higher than the fixed pitch prop will allow under most conditions of flight--especially take off and climb. Does that mean higher engine power output or just better conversion of the same engine output? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) Higher power, presuming of course that you also have the throttle full forward and similar induction systems, etc... Peter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Dohm wrote: 3000 feet density altitude fits with 75% power in the POHs that I recall reading for trainers with fixed pitch props. 75% is available to about 8000 feet, depends on temp. OTOH, high power levels are available to a higher density altitude with a controllable prop--consult the POH. Yes, indeed, consult the POH. The prop is irrelavant to the discussion unless you've installed one hell of a cruise prop that just won't turn up. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Owning | 4 | September 27th 04 07:36 PM |
Emergency Procedures | RD | Piloting | 13 | April 11th 04 08:25 PM |
My Engine Fire!! | [email protected] | Piloting | 21 | April 2nd 04 05:02 PM |
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts | Eric D | Rotorcraft | 22 | March 5th 04 06:11 AM |