![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No one places the loads to exactly so as to balance the airplane. The
elevator downward force is increased or decreased during flight to balance the airplane for varying load conditions. For example, when a passenger walks forward, the elevator downward force must be increased to counteract that. The CG is calculated using the moments and arms to make sure that it falls within the approved limits. If the CG falls too far forward or too far backward, the elevator may not be able to provide the force necessary to balance the airplane. See he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_...%28aircraft%29 Mxsmanic wrote: The manual for my aircraft gives figures for MOM and ARM at various stations, but it doesn't actually explain how to use these to calculate weight and balance. I want to place the load so that the aircraft neither pitches down nor pitches up. Can someone provide me with a pointer to an explanation of the procedure on the Web somewhere? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan writes:
No one places the loads to exactly so as to balance the airplane. The elevator downward force is increased or decreased during flight to balance the airplane for varying load conditions. For example, when a passenger walks forward, the elevator downward force must be increased to counteract that. The CG is calculated using the moments and arms to make sure that it falls within the approved limits. If the CG falls too far forward or too far backward, the elevator may not be able to provide the force necessary to balance the airplane. See he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_...%28aircraft%29 I didn't realize Wikipedia had an article on this. I'll take a look. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
also check faa.gov AC-61-238 "Pilots' Handbook of Aeronautical
Knowledge" will answer all your questions (I hope). Mxsmanic wrote: Andrew Sarangan writes: No one places the loads to exactly so as to balance the airplane. The elevator downward force is increased or decreased during flight to balance the airplane for varying load conditions. For example, when a passenger walks forward, the elevator downward force must be increased to counteract that. The CG is calculated using the moments and arms to make sure that it falls within the approved limits. If the CG falls too far forward or too far backward, the elevator may not be able to provide the force necessary to balance the airplane. See he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_...%28aircraft%29 I didn't realize Wikipedia had an article on this. I'll take a look. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stubby writes:
also check faa.gov AC-61-238 "Pilots' Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge" will answer all your questions (I hope). Section 12 explains the principles behind it, but it didn't actually say how to calculate the center of gravity, or how to achieve neutral trim (which nobody seems to care about except me). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic,
which nobody seems to care about except me) Ah, time to take a clue, isn't it? Why would "neutral trim" be important? For that matter, what would it be? What you get is a range of allowable CGs, which often depends on total weight. This all has to do mostly with elevator authority. Trim (as in the trim wheel) is not really important, trim is just a tool to relieve the pilot. Trim as in weight distribution, well, see above. Once you've figured this out, ponder why an aircraft will be faster or consume less fuel if the CG is as aft as possible. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert writes:
Why would "neutral trim" be important? It allows for maximum control movement in both directions. For that matter, what would it be? Neutral trim in cruise, usually. What you get is a range of allowable CGs, which often depends on total weight. This all has to do mostly with elevator authority. Trim (as in the trim wheel) is not really important, trim is just a tool to relieve the pilot. Any trim adjustment has an effect on the remaining elevator authority beyond the trimmed position. Once you've figured this out, ponder why an aircraft will be faster or consume less fuel if the CG is as aft as possible. I'm not worried about speed or fuel consumption. I'm not in a rush, and I generally take off with full tanks, at least in the Baron. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic,
It allows for maximum control movement in both directions. Maximum relative to what? What do you think the CG limits set forth by the manufacturer are made for? Why would they matter in certification? Why would a manufacturer and a certification authority consider them sufficient? How much control movement do you "lose" when fully trimming to one side? I'm not worried about speed or fuel consumption. I know. You're playing MSFS, a game. But if you where truly interested in these questions, then you'd find the answer very educational. But again you show that you're not. You're an imposter, bending the limits of your interest to maximize insult to the pilots here. That's how you derive an "ego increase" from your visits to this group. Pathetic! But interesting. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
news ![]() Thomas Borchert writes: Why would "neutral trim" be important? It allows for maximum control movement in both directions. hehehe....are you trying to avoid a building? small controll movements are key to a smooth flight. For that matter, what would it be? Neutral trim in cruise, usually. Neutral trim in cruse is not neccisarly good. read about it. What you get is a range of allowable CGs, which often depends on total weight. This all has to do mostly with elevator authority. Trim (as in the trim wheel) is not really important, trim is just a tool to relieve the pilot. Any trim adjustment has an effect on the remaining elevator authority beyond the trimmed position. again, how much elevator do you need? small controll inputs... save up some money and go take a discovory flight at least. It will give you an idea of the fine cotrol one needs...and perhaps answer questions like this. Once you've figured this out, ponder why an aircraft will be faster or consume less fuel if the CG is as aft as possible. I'm not worried about speed or fuel consumption. I'm not in a rush, and I generally take off with full tanks, at least in the Baron. ok, then drive. or if your just intrested in seeing the world from above, fly a balloon. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message news ![]() Thomas Borchert writes: Why would "neutral trim" be important? It allows for maximum control movement in both directions. It Does??? well... that is news to me Changing the trim setting does not change the set screws (Stop bolts) that limit the amount of Rudder, Aileron or Elevator travel. BT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: Thomas Borchert writes: Why would "neutral trim" be important? It allows for maximum control movement in both directions. The trim doesn't affect the total control movements one iota. Any trim adjustment has an effect on the remaining elevator authority beyond the trimmed position. It does no such thing. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differences between automotive & airplane engines | Chris Wells | Home Built | 105 | February 18th 06 11:00 PM |
Pocket PC Weight and Balance Spreadsheet | Navzilla Support | Piloting | 0 | October 9th 05 11:47 PM |
Cessna 172 F Weight and Balance | [email protected] | Owning | 8 | September 22nd 05 02:38 AM |
172S Weight and Balance Question | David J | Piloting | 9 | March 23rd 04 01:08 AM |
Weight and balance.. | Bart | Rotorcraft | 9 | August 19th 03 02:57 AM |