![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote: On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:10:33 GMT, Orval Fairbairn wrote in : In article , Larry Dighera wrote: On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:26:21 GMT, Orval Fairbairn wrote in : It seems to me that we "turned the other cheek" too many times in the past: Lebanon, Khobar Towers, Mogadishu, the embassy bombings, the USS Cole, etc. Can there be too many times? Aggression only spawns more aggression. Isn't that the wisdom behind Christ's words? IMHO, you have to "turn the other cheek" only once. If he hits you again, you flatten him, which is long overdue. That's not a very enlightened attitude, IMO. I think that it is a very enlightened approach -- it assures survival to promote further "enlightened attitudes." J.C. never mentioned what you do after the other guy hits you again. Some people and groups respect only superior force. An alternative to combat must be found. The causes of Martin Luther King and Gandhi prevailed without their resorting to barbarism. It took _sacrifice_ and commitment to a noble ideal, but they would have ultimately failed without the weight of public sentiment being brought to bear in their behalf. Isn't it time we outgrew our reprehensible past behavior, and learned to walk fully upright? If our species doesn't learn to respond passively to attack, the human race is doomed to a life of war. Isn't that obvious? Well -- the first order of business is to understand your adversaries. If their basic attitude is barbarism, then that is all they will understand. Isn't that obvious? Remember -- MLK and Ghandi were dealing with adversaries who operated from a basically civilized point of view. AQ does not -- they only want dominance and to kill "infidels." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() Remember -- MLK and Ghandi were dealing with adversaries who operated from a basically civilized point of view. AQ does not -- they only want dominance and to kill "infidels." Islam does teach to not make friends with infidels, but it does not teach to kill infidels. It teaches to kill enemies of Islam. Danny Deger P.S. Not Muslim. I am Methodist but have read the Koran. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:29:41 -0600, in
, Danny Deger wrote: Islam does teach to not make friends with infidels, but it does not teach to kill infidels. It teaches to kill enemies of Islam. So, all it takes is one camel ****in' Bedoin religious leader to declare that infidels are enemies of Islam and it's open season on us... Fair enough as long as we can declare open season on them... Perhaps we can start out with nuking Mecca during Ramadan... That should be good for about 2 million of them... Unfortunately, there's probably another 1.6 billion of them that would need to be eliminated in order to remove that blight from our planet... Of course, the Texas solutions can be basically summed up this way: "I've got a truck and a chain -- I think we can find a road with your name on it" Hmmm... A quick search of StreetAtlas didn't come up with any streets with Mohammed in their names... Damn, we might have a problem with this one... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Grumman-581" wrote in message news ![]() On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:29:41 -0600, in , Danny Deger wrote: Islam does teach to not make friends with infidels, but it does not teach to kill infidels. It teaches to kill enemies of Islam. So, all it takes is one camel ****in' Bedoin religious leader to declare that infidels are enemies of Islam and it's open season on us... Fair enough as long as we can declare open season on them... Perhaps we can start out with nuking Mecca during Ramadan... Whoa up there cowboy... Wrong Moslem holy festival. They aren't in Mecca for Ramadan, they're there during the Hajj. Jay B (Resident, Tehran, Iran, 1976-77) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:37:08 -0700, in
, Jay Beckman wrote: Whoa up there cowboy... Wrong Moslem holy festival. They aren't in Mecca for Ramadan, they're there during the Hajj. Damn, nearly wasted a nuke... Thanks for the correction... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Beckman wrote:
Wrong Moslem holy festival. They aren't in Mecca for Ramadan, they're there during the Hajj. Jay B (Resident, Tehran, Iran, 1976-77) Since we are picking nits here. The Hajj is the pilgrimage to Mecca that each Muslim is duty bound to make at least once in their life time. It is done during the Muslim month of Dhu al-Hijjah. Gig G (Resident, Bahrain, summers of 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:29:41 -0800, Danny Deger wrote
(in article ): "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() Remember -- MLK and Ghandi were dealing with adversaries who operated from a basically civilized point of view. AQ does not -- they only want dominance and to kill "infidels." Islam does teach to not make friends with infidels, but it does not teach to kill infidels. It teaches to kill enemies of Islam. Danny Deger P.S. Not Muslim. I am Methodist but have read the Koran. Like those "peaceful" Muslims who rioted when Pope Benedict mentioned the violence of their history? They demanded his head, burned churches, and threatened to kill people until the Pope acknowledged that they were "peaceful." The same with the Mohammed cartoons. Muslims were so incensed at being told that they were not peaceful that violent riots swept the whole world for weeks. That kind of "peaceful?" Somebody in the Islamic world maybe needs to get a dictionary and find out what "peaceful" means. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("C J Campbell" wrote)
Like those "peaceful" Muslims who rioted when Pope Benedict mentioned the violence of their history? They demanded his head, burned churches, and threatened to kill people until the Pope acknowledged that they were "peaceful." "Threatened" to kill people? Threatened??? Montblack |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like those "peaceful" Muslims who rioted when Pope Benedict mentioned the
violence of their history? They demanded his head, burned churches, and threatened to kill people until the Pope acknowledged that they were "peaceful." The same with the Mohammed cartoons. Muslims were so incensed at being told that they were not peaceful that violent riots swept the whole world for weeks. That kind of "peaceful?" Somebody in the Islamic world maybe needs to get a dictionary and find out what "peaceful" means. This type of "large group" irrational behavior is not uncommon, even in our country. Look at the "race riots" in the 1960s. Black people were so incensed by their mistreatment that they....burned their own neighborhoods and businesses to the ground. Logical? Nope. Worse, this set of actions set back race relations for at least another generation or two -- not their intended result, I'm sure. "Group-think" is the scariest of all human interactions. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Group-think" is the scariest of all human interactions.
And religion is the scariest of all group-think. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachuting or Piloting Requires Instant Decision Making..........tv clip | Hans | Piloting | 6 | June 19th 06 02:29 PM |
Private piloting in Canada | Ghazan Haider | Piloting | 3 | August 9th 05 02:08 AM |
GWB's piloting fun.... | David E. Powell | Naval Aviation | 38 | May 9th 04 01:32 AM |
King Videos: Practical Piloting and Making Your Own Rules | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | November 6th 03 06:35 PM |