![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 11:25 pm, "Danny Deger" wrote:
I am just about ready to buy an older Taylorcraft that has no electrical system. I am looking for recommendations on a battery operated radio to use in the plane. I would really like one that also works as an intercom. I don't know of any handheld radio that works as an intercom. Those are usually two separate units. I've had great luck with the Softcomm portable intercoms. I've had my current one for over 10 yrs. I just retired my old KX-99 handheld and bought an Icom A-6. The A-24 version has the nav channels. Since I've never been impressed with any handheld's nav capabilities, I opted to skip that feature altogether and go with the A-6. It's an excellent radio. I can pick up ground traffic at PHX, which is 5 miles away. Something my old KX-99 can't do. I've had nothing but good reports on the transmitter, both in the plane and out. I bought mine from Marv Golden, who not only had a great price on the unit, but was also offering a free alkaline battery pack with the unit, along with all of the usual stuff like a charger, Nicad pack and headset adapter. BTW- An external antenna makes a huge difference in your transmission quality. I used to use my old KX-99 as my primary radio when I was based at a class B airport. With the external antenna, I had no problems talking to approach from 30 miles out. When I only used the installed rubber duck antenna, I was lucky to transmit 3-4 miles. John Galban======N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"John Galban" wrote: I just retired my old KX-99 handheld and bought an Icom A-6. The A-24 version has the nav channels. Since I've never been impressed with any handheld's nav capabilities, I opted to skip that feature altogether and go with the A-6. The advantage of having the NAV frequencies is that you can duplex with AFSS over a VOR. The radio can be set to listen on the VOR frequency and transmit on the COM frequency when the PTT is depressed. The NAV function does not work well because of the antenna polarization. NAV frequencies are horizontal, COM frequencies are vertical. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 21, 9:32 am, john smith wrote:
In article . com, The advantage of having the NAV frequencies is that you can duplex with AFSS over a VOR. The radio can be set to listen on the VOR frequency and transmit on the COM frequency when the PTT is depressed. The NAV function does not work well because of the antenna polarization. NAV frequencies are horizontal, COM frequencies are vertical. That is true. It was a handy feature 20 yrs. ago, but the proliferation of RCOs, even out here in the west, means that it's a pretty rare occasion that you actually have to talk to and FSS over a VOR. I haven't done it in years. YMMV. Antenna polarization is the key to nav performance on the handheld. I once hooked mine up to the horizontal nav antenna instead of the vertical com antenna. Nav performance was rock solid, but my com performance suffered quite a bit. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You bring up an interesting point...
I wonder if there is some sort of "black box" that will allow you to connect both a Com and a Nav to a handheld at the same time? "John Galban" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 21, 9:32 am, john smith wrote: In article . com, The advantage of having the NAV frequencies is that you can duplex with AFSS over a VOR. The radio can be set to listen on the VOR frequency and transmit on the COM frequency when the PTT is depressed. The NAV function does not work well because of the antenna polarization. NAV frequencies are horizontal, COM frequencies are vertical. That is true. It was a handy feature 20 yrs. ago, but the proliferation of RCOs, even out here in the west, means that it's a pretty rare occasion that you actually have to talk to and FSS over a VOR. I haven't done it in years. YMMV. Antenna polarization is the key to nav performance on the handheld. I once hooked mine up to the horizontal nav antenna instead of the vertical com antenna. Nav performance was rock solid, but my com performance suffered quite a bit. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HANDHELD RADIO | [email protected] | Soaring | 22 | March 17th 16 03:16 PM |
Navman PiN 570 - PDA/Navigation Portable Handheld Device | Doug Haluza | Soaring | 1 | August 28th 06 06:04 PM |
Portable Radio | Waduino | Soaring | 12 | September 14th 05 06:36 PM |
Portable radio scanners | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 1 | August 1st 05 02:05 PM |
Portable XM Radio receiver in the cockpit? | Peter R. | Piloting | 13 | September 4th 04 03:46 AM |