![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 7:22 pm, DR wrote:
[...] Based on your extolling the virtues of MSX I recently got the latest version and tried it out with the aircraft I'm training on. Basically I'd have to say it simulates a C172 very poorly and I'd say it's only use is for simulated instrument flying. Even so, it's response does not mimic my aircraft near the limits of the flight envelope -it behaves like a flying game really. Red Bull flying race? What a pile! A lot of people think FS2004 is better than the latest version, because it needs less computer horsepower. MSFS is like the Star Trek movies... every other one is a dog ;-) In any case, download the RealAir C172, it acts better than the stock version: http://www.realairsimulations.com/li...page=downloads Luck! Kev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ID Please - Throttle Quad | Orval Fairbairn | Restoration | 0 | December 17th 05 08:35 PM |
Throttle movement | Max Richter | Naval Aviation | 12 | December 11th 04 11:09 PM |
Engine throttle | Bob Ingraham | Simulators | 13 | December 11th 04 07:17 PM |
Which throttle governer? | Garfiel | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 13th 03 04:30 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |