![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie writes:
And flaps...it has to have flaps. Don't small single-engine planes have flaps? The number of engines doesn't matter. By the way a twin with two HP wouldn't be HP either. High-performance, complex ... when did the FAA set these standards? It must have been when the Wright brothers were around if they are this low. To me, an F-16 is high performance, not a Baron. And a Space Shuttle is complex (or, arguably, a large jet airliner). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Natalie writes: And flaps...it has to have flaps. Don't small single-engine planes have flaps? The number of engines doesn't matter. By the way a twin with two HP wouldn't be HP either. High-performance, complex ... when did the FAA set these standards? It must have been when the Wright brothers were around if they are this low. To me, an F-16 is high performance, not a Baron. And a Space Shuttle is complex (or, arguably, a large jet airliner). That's because you have no idea what happens in the real world. Compared with ms flight sim on a computer an ultralight is high performance and complex... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim writes:
That's because you have no idea what happens in the real world. Maybe I'm just smarter than a lot of pilots, if they call a Baron "complex" or "high performance." Compared with ms flight sim on a computer an ultralight is high performance and complex... Try it. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Tim writes: That's because you have no idea what happens in the real world. Maybe I'm just smarter than a lot of pilots, if they call a Baron "complex" or "high performance." Maybe. But I don't think that has anything to do with your delusions about being able to fly a real Baron. Compared with ms flight sim on a computer an ultralight is high performance and complex... Try it. I have. It is a nice game. I prefer the real thing though. They have very little in common. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim writes:
But I don't think that has anything to do with your delusions about being able to fly a real Baron. Since it hasn't been tested, we don't know if it's a delusion or not. I have. It is a nice game. I prefer the real thing though. They have very little in common. If so, you haven't configured your sim correctly. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 2:23 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tim writes: But I don't think that has anything to do with your delusions about being able to fly a real Baron. Since it hasn't been tested, we don't know if it's a delusion or not. I have. It is a nice game. I prefer the real thing though. They have very little in common. If so, you haven't configured your sim correctly. Configure all you want. The Microsoft sim-game, played on a stationary computer at ground level, has very little in common with a real aircraft moving at altitude. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary writes:
Configure all you want. The Microsoft sim-game, played on a stationary computer at ground level, has very little in common with a real aircraft moving at altitude. As I've said, it sounds like you don't have your sim configured correctly. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Tim writes: But I don't think that has anything to do with your delusions about being able to fly a real Baron. Since it hasn't been tested, we don't know if it's a delusion or not. I have. It is a nice game. I prefer the real thing though. They have very little in common. If so, you haven't configured your sim correctly. I am pretty sure I am in a better position to judge this than you. I have flown real airplanes. I own one. I have played MS flight sim. It is fun to do instrument approaches with it - it is somewhat helpful in keeping me practiced at the procedures. I KNOW which one is real, and which one isn't. Apparently you mistake your computer world for the real one. I, however, do not have that problem. It has nothing to do with configuring my game. It has everything to do with you configuring your mind. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim writes:
I have played MS flight sim. It is fun to do instrument approaches with it - it is somewhat helpful in keeping me practiced at the procedures. Which aircraft do you simulate, what type of flight controls do you have, and which add-ons do you have installed? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim" wrote in message ... I have played MS flight sim. Operative word here is "played". Another PLONK |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ID Please - Throttle Quad | Orval Fairbairn | Restoration | 0 | December 17th 05 08:35 PM |
Throttle movement | Max Richter | Naval Aviation | 12 | December 11th 04 11:09 PM |
Engine throttle | Bob Ingraham | Simulators | 13 | December 11th 04 07:17 PM |
Which throttle governer? | Garfiel | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 13th 03 04:30 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |